Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Phil Beard Resigns.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by The Merry Ploughboy
    I'm with v, one bungle brother down, one to go
    Devlin a great shout, by all accounts doing an amazing job at Brentford
    Maybe if we go for Devlin we may go for Warburton too?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Ninja
    replied
    Not 100% sure what he actually did, but a nice fella all the same. Good luck to him.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Merry Ploughboy
    replied
    I'm with v, one bungle brother down, one to go
    Devlin a great shout, by all accounts doing an amazing job at Brentford

    Leave a comment:


  • nasser95
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    How about finding one the slightest bit competent? that would be a start
    Yea because setting up the O2 project needed someone incompetent. Honestly, you need to realise that he was a very good appointment that didn't work out as brilliantly as we would have liked, simple as that.

    Leave a comment:


  • West Acton
    replied
    Im going to buck the trend here and say I liked the bloke best of luck to him

    Leave a comment:


  • Stanley
    replied
    Originally posted by oldskoolturk
    I would hope that Les is not responsible for Phil Beard going or indeed take over his responsibilities. Personally I would be uncomfortable with one person having control of all player transfers, manager hiring, staff recruitment, club development, commercial activity and so on. We've been there before with Mike Rigg and look how that turned out
    I think those fears can be allayed:

    QPR Chairman, Tony Fernandes, told www.qpr.co.uk:

    “I would like to take this opportunity to thank Phil for his contribution to QPR and wish him well for the future. In the short term we will continue to liaise with Phil regarding our long-term projects, ensuring a smooth transitional period prior to making a new appointment."

    Devlin or Dein both great shouts V.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by oldskoolturk
    I would hope that Les is not responsible for Phil Beard going or indeed take over his responsibilities. Personally I would be uncomfortable with one person having control of all player transfers, manager hiring, staff recruitment, club development, commercial activity and so on. We've been there before with Mike Rigg and look how that turned out
    Wouldnt surprise me if that is the scenario. TF throws all his eggs in one basket and leaves it all up to Les, then if it goes wrong....

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by nasser95
    Most clubs do that ffs. Very difficult to find people for the CEO role with a good reputation in the sport who would be willing to leave their role at the moment.
    How about finding one the slightest bit competent? that would be a start

    Leave a comment:


  • oldskoolturk
    replied
    I would hope that Les is not responsible for Phil Beard going or indeed take over his responsibilities. Personally I would be uncomfortable with one person having control of all player transfers, manager hiring, staff recruitment, club development, commercial activity and so on. We've been there before with Mike Rigg and look how that turned out

    Leave a comment:


  • nasser95
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    Sure theres a chance the right board could do it right..not this lot tho. Too concerned with branding and profile. FFS they appointed Beard as CEO because of his O2 experience not what he could do for a football club. That just about sums them up.
    Most clubs do that ffs. Very difficult to find people for the CEO role with a good reputation in the sport who would be willing to leave their role at the moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by nasser95
    You are looking at two extreme cases, what about the West Hams. The Tottenhams, the clubs outside london who have expanded and grown without killing their tradition and history?
    Sure theres a chance with the right board it could be done right..not this lot tho. Too concerned with branding and profile and making millions. FFS they appointed Beard as CEO because of his O2 experience not what he could do for a football club. That just about sums them up. Mistake after mistake after mistake... OOC or bust.

    Leave a comment:


  • nasser95
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    Potential of becoming another Fulham? yes. Potential of becoming another like the scum? yup. Tradition and history not plastic flags and plastic fans. Even this glitzy, glamorous non competitive league that SKY have created is a bit plastic.
    You are looking at two extreme cases, what about the West Hams. The Tottenhams, the clubs outside london who have expanded and grown without killing their tradition and history?

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Stanley
    Yes Nasser, that does seem to be a pretty accurate description.
    Potential of becoming another Fulham? yes. Potential of becoming another like the scum? yup. Tradition and history not plastic flags and plastic fans. Even this glitzy, glamorous non competitive league that SKY have created is a bit plastic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stanley
    replied
    Originally posted by nasser95
    So, in these words, V wants to hold the club back from its potential?
    Yes Nasser, that does seem to be a pretty accurate description.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by West London is Rss
    People appreciate and respect your views V but you also have to have a level of understanding of the opposite side of your view - This is what you seem to lack.
    Not at all mate. As i have said many times over the years i completely understand i am in the minority of distrusting the chairman and i fully accept your opinion of him and your views. Dont really know what more i can say. I will never convince you and you will never convince me. If i comment on the chairman in a disingenuous way then you have the right to defend him obviously and it works both ways. Opinions mate...makes for a good forum.

    Leave a comment:

Working...