If QPR go down should Fernandes resign

[QPR Richard]

You probably didn't mean me, Richard, but I like TF and voted no. I just don't like his decision regarding HR.

Understandable, a lot of people aren't happy about that decision. But I also understand why the board took that decision (and it was a board decision). The options are limited at present and time is short.

[vespa]

And why do you always want to stick the boot into the chairman every chance you get? It's relentless. Time to give it a rest eh? We know how you feel about TF.

Relentless ?
Show me just one time in this thread where ive put the boot into the chairman .Just one.
You can`t because i havn`t .
You do talk some f anny.

[Tarbie]

I like Fernandes but I think he's proved he ain't got a clue how to run a club.

That in itself isn't a problem as long as you surround yourself with people who do know how to run a football club. Failing to do that is Fernandes' biggest error!

[Tarbie]

You have to also remember that we we're making a loss in the championship each week when Flavio was here. Wages were low as well, the only thing we can do is attract players from lower leagues if this board are to leave.

Then there will be no hope of ever coming back up.

I think with the new FFP laws we're unlikely to ever come back if we go down this year. I also worry that unless Fernandes and the rest of the board are prepared to write off what is owed then we'll be fighting for our very existence.

[QPR Richard]

Relentless ?
Show me just one time in this thread where ive put the boot into the chairman .Just one.
You can`t because i havn`t .
You do talk some f anny.

I'm not talking about this thread in particular. You just seem to have some vendetta against him. Time to lay off him perhaps?

[vespa]

I'm not talking about this thread in particular. You just seem to have some vendetta against him. Time to lay off him perhaps?

All ive ever done is question and debate and not blindly believe everything the TF spin machine churns out.
Show me evidence of a vendetta , or stop making ludicrous accusations .

[QPR Richard]

All ive ever done is question and debate and not blindly believe everything the TF spin machine churns out.
Show me evidence of a vendetta , or stop making ludicrous accusations .

Come on, look how you got over the new stadium business. All the gang of four stuff. Remember?

[vespa]

Come on, look how you got over the new stadium business. All the gang of four stuff. Remember?

never a vendetta against TF ,i just don`t want to leave Loftus Rd for a soulless stadium ,thats far too big for us.
Ive always made that clear ,but have never ever had some sort of vendetta against the man .
I would appreciate it if you were man enough to take that back .

[bushcelt1]

I'm not talking about this thread in particular. You just seem to have some vendetta against him. Time to lay off him perhaps?

thats not an accurate account of how vespa posts. i agree that we have fans who always have the knives out but he's not one of them. good balanced debate by a good lad.

[vespa]

thats not an accurate account of how vespa posts. i agree that we have fans who always have the knives out but he's not one of them. good balanced debate by a good lad.

[QPR Richard]

never a vendetta against TF ,i just don`t want to leave Loftus Rd for a soulless stadium ,thats far too big for us.
Ive always made that clear ,but have never ever had some sort of vendetta against the man .
I would appreciate it if you were man enough to take that back .

Ok fair enough. I apologise if you feel I've gone overboard. I just think you've been harsh on him when all he's trying to do is take us to a higher level.

As for a soulless stadium, it's not the building at fault, it's those who frequent it.

[vespa]

Ok fair enough. I apologise if you feel I've gone overboard. I just think you've been harsh on him when all he's trying to do is take us to a higher level.

As for a soulless stadium, it's not the building at fault, it's those who frequent it.

If you think ive been harsh on him in the past ,thats only because he is playing around with something that i love ( as we all on here do ) , and i dont agree with his vision for QPR.
The stadium debate ,is probably best left for a another day ,i,m sure you agree .
Cheers for the apology .

[vblockranger]

If you think ive been harsh on him in the past ,thats only because he is playing around with something that i love ( as we all on here do ) , and i dont agree with his vision for QPR.

[MYU]

The stadium plans are not new at all, every chairman we've had has been looking into developing LR or building a new ground. In order to keep our club with today's demands we need to start looking into it now, it's not new.

How do you expect us to pay the player wage demands with little old LR?

[loneranger]

The stadium plans are not new at all, every chairman we've had has been looking into developing LR or building a new ground. In order to keep our club with today's demands we need to start looking into it now, it's not new.

How do you expect us to pay the player wage demands with little old LR?

It's not really about revenue from the stadium. All that pales into insignificance against tv money and suchlike.