Are we that bad?

[Factamondo]

however we are actually bad as defined in the collins english dictionary!

[Ranger]

however we are actually bad as defined in the collins english dictionary!

Dam theres me thinking we were Michael jackson " bad "

[twranger]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10417896

he only got a desmond matt.

[twranger]

I know he will want me banned from this forum but just read the blokes posts.

It's a rare day where he doesn't look down his nose and insult fellow r's fans.
He really needs to sort out that attitude because it is quite frankly disgusting.

don't want you banned at all. never given it a thought as you are of no consequence at all. just some random person on a football forum.

[Tarbie]

Chelsea are doing well, why not give them a shot! Right up your street.

You sir are quite possibly the biggest tool on the planet!

[Factamondo]

too be fair he has played football at a high level!

[72bus]

Chelsea are doing well, why not give them a shot! Right up your street.

why post that

[twranger]

why post that

Why not? Free country. He's moaning and slagging qpr off so much, thought a change to a successful club might be beneficial, that's all. thanks for replying though!

[twranger]

You sir are quite possibly the biggest tool on the planet!

Thanks! At least you know how to address your superiors, i'll give you that. Good lad!

[Tarbie]

Thanks! At least you know how to address your superiors, i'll give you that. Good lad!

Don't make me laugh. I've had morning turds more superior than you!

[twranger]

Don't make me laugh. I've had morning turds more superior than you!

You don't know me so shut your big gob, bloody tax exiles!!!!

[stanistheman]

Everyone on this site is punishing the club for our dismal performance against Sheffield. And I totally agreed with what have been said about THAT game. It seems now that we are all giving up on our survival, just because we lost heavily to a DIV 1 outfit. However, are we that bad? We criticise that player and the other, claiming that we have no wingers; Austin needs help; there's no cover for the fullbacks positions; we needs to strengthen the midfield; central defenders are too slow........and the list goes on and on. All this lets me conclude that we should be in DIV 2 and not the Premier. For GOD sake, we are fighting for survival and not to win the Premier league! We better have a long look at the mirror. If we are realistic and if luck was on our side, we should have been unbeaten at home in the league. (FA Cup apart!) And we should have also gained at least another SIX other points from our home games. We missed a penalty against Hull that would gave us a point; we should avoided the injury time defeat to Liverpool and gained another point; we should have hang on to a win against Man City and that's another two points; and we should also hanged on against the Swans and gained another two points. As for the away form, there were at least 3 games were we should gained at least a point. So, all in all, with all the criticism that we address to the R's.......are we that bad?

Whilst i agree with you about the home games I am not sure I know which 3 away games you think QPR deserved points from.
would have been fortunate to get a draw Chelsea who had much more of the game, Didnt deserve anything at Newcastle as didnt create any chances and nothing really at Arsenal as QPR were terrible for much of it had a very lucky penalty awarded and a genuine foul in the box turned down (If the ref had made the correct calls they would still have lost 2-1.
I chose those games as along with southampton are the only 1 goal defeats they suffered.

[oldskoolturk]

Good OP. I like the way our wins against leicester and burnley at home are dismissed as 'only leicester and burnley' and yet in the same breath people rave about their away records!

[MattyRangers]

he only got a desmond matt.

A Desmond in pure maths ain't too shabby tbf! Slightly higher than a base level cave man anyway

Got meself a 2:1 in mine so I can share the sentiment of your post in looking down at a Desmond though

[twranger]

A Desmond in pure maths ain't too shabby tbf! Slightly higher than a base level cave man anyway

Got meself a 2:1 in mine so I can share the sentiment of your post in looking down at a Desmond though

2:1 is ok....... what was that in mate?