Maybe that's a question you could pose to the RAWK collective? Did we pay enough compensation for him? Should the rules on such "transfers" be reviewed by the FA? Are the current rules biased in favour of the more successful or more wealthy clubs? Do you think QPR will ever see that 20%? Is the clause real? etc
"Liverpool only paid QPR £600k for Sterling up front, but there were additional clauses—clauses it seems impossible won't eventually be triggered and some of which likely already have been—that could raise that fee to around £5M. Throw in a 20% sell-on fee, and QPR would stand to turn a solid profit on Sterling if such a sale ever came to pass."
"Liverpool only paid QPR £600k for Sterling up front, but there were additional clauses—clauses it seems impossible won't eventually be triggered and some of which likely already have been—that could raise that fee to around £5M. Throw in a 20% sell-on fee, and QPR would stand to turn a solid profit on Sterling if such a sale ever came to pass."
, even with Sir Les in.
Comment