Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

should zamora start

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jimmy Floyd Rabbit
    Gold Seat
    • Sep 2012
    • 8957

    #16
    Originally posted by rhysthomsonqpr
    i would rather bobby starting with austin then when he starts getting exhausted bring vargas' pace into the game
    When we're 2 or 3-0 down?

    Start him, get some goals then shore it up.

    Comment

    • rhysthomsonqpr
      Apprentice
      • Oct 2014
      • 149

      #17
      even if you have zamora on for the first half and try to nick a goal i agree hes getting older so injuries may occur but instead of spending on midfielders when we have enough of, he should have brought a player in similar to zamora... a target man.

      Comment

      • Shepherds Mush
        Platinum Seat
        • Nov 2012
        • 10325

        #18
        Not a starter for me. Austin and Vargas should be the pairing.

        Comment

        • MYU
          #####istrator
          • Mar 2009
          • 43466

          #19
          We need some movement so I'd play Vargas with Adel behind him. These two are more on the same wavelength, the rest of them need to learn.

          Bobby is a super sub.

          Comment

          • Rangers77
            Platinum Seat
            • Aug 2012
            • 11808

            #20
            Originally posted by MYU
            We need some movement so I'd play Vargas with Adel behind him. These two are more on the same wavelength, the rest of them need to learn.

            Bobby is a super sub.
            That might work..... Charlie's benchmeat for me at present. Would start with Bob over him.

            Comment

            • OneEyedWilly
              Silver Seat
              • Dec 2012
              • 1239

              #21
              Can we clone 3 more bobbys in the lab? 1 for every 20 mins. The rest of the time adel can kust stand there doing step overs.

              Comment

              • QPRWEBBIE
                Silver Seat
                • Mar 2011
                • 3172

                #22
                It's a no brainer, you have to start him as every time his come on his changed the flow of the game, no point bringing him on when we are 2 or 3 down we need to get ahead in games.

                Comment

                • rhysthomsonqpr
                  Apprentice
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 149

                  #23
                  Originally posted by QPRWEBBIE
                  It's a no brainer, you have to start him as every time his come on his changed the flow of the game, no point bringing him on when we are 2 or 3 down we need to get ahead in games.
                  i agree he bring stability to the game where he can hold it up

                  Comment

                  Working...