We are where we are with players till January. No specialist LB or RB. Dunne and Hill too slow. Rio costing us goals.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
2 or 3 CB's. What would you do about our defensive dilemna?
Collapse
X
-
What I love is when we were originally playing 3 at the back it wasn't really working and the defence just looked uncomfortable, so people started crying out to play 4 at the back, now thats not working people are again crying out for 3 at the back..... how about we get a bit of patience stick with a formation and learn how to play it with these players instead of doing a Vincent Tan every focking week!!.... p.s drop Isla, Green, Austin etc etc etc etc
SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!! -
When Sandro plays I would be happy with 2 CBs but when he isn't around we really need 3.
My issue with either formation is 2 strikers.... We seem to have an issue up front though where when we have 2 strikers they always get the ball with their back to goal and are always surrounded. Would rather see a number 10 creating movement and taking the ball forwardComment
-
If we play 3 then it should be Clint left side. Crazy that he didn´t get the games ahead of Dunne, when we played 3, he is the only left footed CB at the club, ffs. (and best stats of players from last season)Comment
-
If we were to resort back to the 3 CBs (I doubt we will though tbh) then it would surely be Caulker Rio and Nedum?You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.Comment
-
-
Agree with that apart from Green in goal.
Just not up to it at this level.
McCatrthy needs to start and be given a run in the team.
Confidence, defensively, starts at the back and I don't believe our defenders are confident in Green.Comment
-
"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
Comment