Although Hill hasn't let us down this season the fact is with Hill & Ferdinand playing they are both painfully slow so we drop too deep therefore in order to push us higher up the pitch we need Onuoha and either Yun/Traorae in the team
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why not Ned?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by HoopDoggyDogg View PostReally can't see why he isn't getting a chance.
I still think Rio and Caulker will come good this season, but we have no-one with pace at the back.
Ned n Caulker could be a great partnership for years to come.
Comment
-
The fact is since we brought the chief in January 2012 he's never commanded a regular place at CB. He's probably played more games out of position at RB. I like the guy, but he looked shaky against Burton Albion and was at fault for Spurs' fourth (when playing, as usual, out of position at RB: Simpson was on the bench when Dunne was pulled,to play four at the back). The chief is so right sided it's unbelievable. That means he has to replace Caulker, not Rio. Even if, as we should given our FB, we play three at the back with wing backs, the chief surely can't play on the left of the three. Give him a go, by all means, should things not go well, but it's hard to think that he's the saviour waiting in the wings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dave58 View PostCouldn't agree more The Chief was one of our best players last year, seems to be being overlooked, I personally think he's better than ferdinand & Caulker and would have him in with one of them, also clnt starting to get found out it's about time give Yun a go.
I was saying all pre season Ned was a definite starter.
I'd also almost say it was common sense that a RB or LB needs to be an energetic player to keep up with the attacking wingers coming at you. All very well being a solid defender, but in those positions in particular you need to keep up with the pace as well (Yun), especially in the pre!SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!
Comment
-
I cant see Ned getting a chance with Caulker and Rio fit..
Caulker is decent and the whole reason he came was to play alongside Rio so the reality is unless Rio gets injured, Ned isn't going to play.
The only thing I do question Ned on is his technical ability. Rio and Caulker are great in this department.. I am not so sure Ned is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by West London is Rss View PostI cant see Ned getting a chance with Caulker and Rio fit..
Caulker is decent and the whole reason he came was to play alongside Rio so the reality is unless Rio gets injured, Ned isn't going to play.
The only thing I do question Ned on is his technical ability. Rio and Caulker are great in this department.. I am not so sure Ned is.We Are The People.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by West London is Rss View PostI cant see Ned getting a chance with Caulker and Rio fit..
Caulker is decent and the whole reason he came was to play alongside Rio so the reality is unless Rio gets injured, Ned isn't going to play.
The only thing I do question Ned on is his technical ability. Rio and Caulker are great in this department.. I am not so sure Ned is.QPR fan since1987
@yousef_qpr
Comment
-
There are 3 players that have played all minutes for these 4 matches and they happen to play in the backbone of any defence, Green, Caulker, Ferdinand. I think they are all fit and were not on international duty, HR excuses. At the same rate they will concede 85 goals for the season. It will be very difficult to stay up with that. Something needs to be done and I do not believe Hill and/or Dunne are the solution. IMO HR needs to find a way to field Ned. For me it should be with 3 at the back because we have no fullbacks. Simpson gone, Isla and Traore wingbacks and Yun out nobody knows why. Some people say Ned cant play on the left because he is so right sided it's unbelievable. Does the same then apply for Caulker and Ferdinand. Of course it is difficult to have Caulker who only plays if Ferdinand plays. I would go with Onuoha-Ferdinand-Caulker at the back with Isla and Traore on the wings with Barton-Sandro-Fer in the middle. With that we are best using the strenghts of the squad. This opens the possibility for 2 strikers and we need to improve on 1 goal in 4 matches - at the same rate 10 goals for the season Even they would all come in 1-0 wins it would mean relegation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hh9 View PostThere are 3 players that have played all minutes for these 4 matches and they happen to play in the backbone of any defence, Green, Caulker, Ferdinand. I think they are all fit and were not on international duty, HR excuses. At the same rate they will concede 85 goals for the season. It will be very difficult to stay up with that. Something needs to be done and I do not believe Hill and/or Dunne are the solution. IMO HR needs to find a way to field Ned. For me it should be with 3 at the back because we have no fullbacks. Simpson gone, Isla and Traore wingbacks and Yun out nobody knows why. Some people say Ned cant play on the left because he is so right sided it's unbelievable. Does the same then apply for Caulker and Ferdinand. Of course it is difficult to have Caulker who only plays if Ferdinand plays. I would go with Onuoha-Ferdinand-Caulker at the back with Isla and Traore on the wings with Barton-Sandro-Fer in the middle. With that we are best using the strenghts of the squad. This opens the possibility for 2 strikers and we need to improve on 1 goal in 4 matches - at the same rate 10 goals for the season Even they would all come in 1-0 wins it would mean relegation.
Funny thing with your 85 goal prediction, Fulham last season conceded the most in the prem with 85 goals, behind them was Cardiff with 74 goals againstSIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!
Comment
Comment