Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Still plenty of hope for QPR

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • geejaybee
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 3377

    #1

    Still plenty of hope for QPR

    Still Plenty of Hope for Queens Park Rangers by Toby Nathan for EPLIndex.com
  • Kirill
    W12 Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 19359

    #2
    Not convincing.
    Banning people is no longer my hobby,
    but take a look at my photo blog:

    http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/

    How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
    http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852

    Comment

    • WeAreQPR12
      C Club
      • Mar 2009
      • 23558

      #3
      excellent manager? Why the fu ck put those 2 words in the last sentence instead of the 1st.

      Bloke who wrote is clearly likes to end on a high. Whatever drug he is on!
      I played sunday league football today.

      Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

      I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

      We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

      Comment

      • Hitman34
        Platinum Seat
        • Jan 2012
        • 13959

        #4
        the second bollx artical that i have read today. the first one was deleted on here earlier regarding the tw at hayward at the express paper.

        anyway, to address this crap piece of journalism, we have a minus goal difference of 7 goals because we just played a team who have spent 200 milion on players. the other team is a top 6 club. we outplayed hull and were unlucky to lose. sunderland we beat and deservadly so.

        so leaving out the top 6 teams so far we have p2 w1 L1 gf1 ga1
        im comfortable with that. another 3 points from our next to games will be just as good.
        nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

        Comment

        • Nick
          Gold Seat
          • Oct 2013
          • 5593

          #5
          Originally posted by Hitman34
          the second bollx artical that i have read today. the first one was deleted on here earlier regarding the tw at hayward at the express paper.

          anyway, to address this crap piece of journalism, we have a minus goal difference of 7 goals because we just played a team who have spent 200 milion on players. the other team is a top 6 club. we outplayed hull and were unlucky to lose. sunderland we beat and deservadly so.

          so leaving out the top 6 teams so far we have p2 w1 L1 gf1 ga1
          im comfortable with that. another 3 points from our next to games will be just as good.
          Exactly! A bit of common sense talked there Hits.
          SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

          Comment

          • BuffooneRy
            Bronze Seat
            • Apr 2009
            • 886

            #6
            Originally posted by Hitman34
            the second bollx artical that i have read today. the first one was deleted on here earlier regarding the tw at hayward at the express paper.

            anyway, to address this crap piece of journalism, we have a minus goal difference of 7 goals because we just played a team who have spent 200 milion on players. the other team is a top 6 club. we outplayed hull and were unlucky to lose. sunderland we beat and deservadly so.

            so leaving out the top 6 teams so far we have p2 w1 L1 gf1 ga1
            im comfortable with that. another 3 points from our next to games will be just as good.
            Smoke and mirrors as those two maulings can't have done confidence let alone anyone remotely associated with QPR's pride any favours..... We need to toughen and wise up a bit sharpish or else we'll be bottom by Oct and playing catch up.....

            Comment

            Working...