Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

If keeping remy meant.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MYU
    Administrator
    • Mar 2009
    • 43466

    #16
    Keep Remy and loan a CB.

    Comment

    • QPR1976
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 2391

      #17
      Firstly, with Champs League teams not interested, the £8.5m is gone. He'll cost £11m to 2 clubs or £15m to anyone else.
      That changes the question. In theory we could bring in Deeney & Hooper for that & still have change.

      Secondly, we won't bring in 4 more if Remy leaves. We've only got room for 2 more in the 25.
      3 if Remy goes. Only 4 if SWP is not selected (or 3.5 ?) or Henry goes to Naarwich.

      Finally, I'd keep Remy.
      Last edited by QPR1976; 07-08-2014, 11:17 PM.

      Comment

      • stanistheman
        Platinum Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 11151

        #18
        Originally posted by JuniorPower
        Rather Keep Rémy, if he can keep scoring the goals then there's no worries!
        rather keep him too. I'm not sure what players QPR would be able to bring in for 8.5-11.5M they might get for Remy. Diame and Sankhere would cost around £6M and that would not leave much left for a striker.

        Comment

        • QPR1234
          Gold Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 5250

          #19
          only if remy signed a new contract would I keep. otherwise the guy is completely short term. Most likely go in Jan
          Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
          Lovejoy: "No?!"
          Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"

          Please Follow My Twitter

          Comment

          • Shepherds Mush
            Platinum Seat
            • Nov 2012
            • 10325

            #20
            For me it depends on his interaction with the squad, which so far seems ok so I would keep him as we would never get a better striker for his sale value.

            Comment

            Working...