Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Newcastle close to getting marlon h...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stainrodisalegend
    Platinum Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 13624

    #1

    Newcastle close to getting marlon h...

    coventry in for healy. i trust the great, great win in the valleys isn't going to convince the club they are fine up front. man city were without four first team strikers against man u, so even with one more striker we might well look v short up front come the closing stages of the season, particulary if helguson stays at that ##### encampment just up the M1.
  • Rebel R's
    King of Pessimism
    • Mar 2009
    • 12266

    #2
    yes,we definetly need a quality striker,i am surprised we arent in for Harewood or Healy.Loaning Helgs makes NO sense unless he is replaced,we are very short up front,despite sats win.

    Comment

    • BennyBoyRs
      I like 'Lone' time
      • Mar 2009
      • 13695

      #3
      I'll be hugely dissapointed if we don't strengthen up top. Yes, Simpson scored twice and Vine played well, but we still need a goal scorer. If one of those two get injured, we're in trouble.
      Your mum would love me...

      Comment

      • qblockpete
        C Club
        • Mar 2009
        • 22186

        #4
        Thats the issue for me, if one of those get injured we need one. Problem is, you cannot bring in a player and say "your have to sit on the bench".

        Touch wood nothing happens to these two ( Vine more like his old self on Saturday), but you'd only be able to get someone in, if one gets injured.

        Striker, won't come to be on the bench. (if you get my drift)
        ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
        THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

        Comment

        • qprjim
          Bronze Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 948

          #5
          Originally posted by qblockpete
          Thats the issue for me, if one of those get injured we need one. Problem is, you cannot bring in a player and say "your have to sit on the bench".

          Touch wood nothing happens to these two ( Vine more like his old self on Saturday), but you'd only be able to get someone in, if one gets injured.

          Striker, won't come to be on the bench. (if you get my drift)
          agree but who in their right mind would tell that to a striker,

          you sell him the club and tell him he's here to fight for his position and if he looks sharper in training than the likes of vine, then he starts, its not science, rocket!
          Win or lose, on the booze

          Comment

          • Rebel R's
            King of Pessimism
            • Mar 2009
            • 12266

            #6
            problem here,once again is we win a game,score 2 goals in a game for the 1st time this season(league) and some now think we dont need a striker again!.Remember Vine has been poor up to yesterday and Simpson does not have a great scoring record,so I for one will not be fooled into thinking otherwise because of saturdays win.

            Comment

            • bonkerrrrs
              Bronze Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 614

              #7
              So which one do we leave on the bench for a new striker if we got one in this week?

              I for one would like some stability in the team now (injuries allowing)

              Comment

              • Rebel R's
                King of Pessimism
                • Mar 2009
                • 12266

                #8
                Originally posted by bonkerrrrs
                So which one do we leave on the bench for a new striker if we got one in this week?

                I for one would like some stability in the team now (injuries allowing)
                Vine,his scoring rate is terrible

                Comment

                • BennyBoyRs
                  I like 'Lone' time
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 13695

                  #9
                  Originally posted by qblockpete
                  Thats the issue for me, if one of those get injured we need one. Problem is, you cannot bring in a player and say "your have to sit on the bench".

                  Touch wood nothing happens to these two ( Vine more like his old self on Saturday), but you'd only be able to get someone in, if one gets injured.

                  Striker, won't come to be on the bench. (if you get my drift)
                  Why does one need to st on the bench?

                  If they are good enough, they can be rotated. Not only that, but even when a striker is not started, it's always good to bring them on.
                  Your mum would love me...

                  Comment

                  • Funky
                    Silver Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 2189

                    #10
                    Logic would suggest that we will bring in another forward.

                    If he is available and could be tempted I'd still take a look at Kevin Phillips at Birmingham
                    http://www.facebook.com/pages/1882QP...5398272?ref=ts

                    Comment

                    • stainrodisalegend
                      Platinum Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 13624

                      #11
                      But its pointless saying "cross fingers" - one of them is bound 2 get injured over a season. Plus vine isn't a scorer. And any team serious about promotion needs competition. If one win makes us go back on our plans 4 a striker I'd despair...

                      Comment

                      • Scarlet pimple
                        Gold Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 5006

                        #12
                        Who will pay the wages.........flav might be on his way out!!!!!
                        They seek him here.................

                        Comment

                        Working...