Park not interested in coming back...

[madara]

He was actually a signing that at the time I thought made sense, I think the talk of him just being here to sell shirts didn't do his reputation justice.
However he was absolutely terrible for us. All he did was one cross.
For some strange reason I didn't bracket him with other elderly prem players that would just be injured, rubbish and be on a QPR final salary pension scheme.
I thought he would provide discipline, grit and be commanding especially as he came from utd and I thought now wrongly be in the mould of scholes, giggs etc , providing attributes that our merry group of highly paid mercenaries would learn from but he was a complete flop, don't buy he weren't played regularly or in wrong position, his whole career was based on being able to come in from the cold and do a job.
To me the game always looked to fast for him.

I strongly disagree on the bold part. SAF tried using him as an impact sub 2nd or 3rd season with united but soon found out that getting the most from Park requires playing him regularly.

[Shepherds Mush]

but soon found out that getting the most from Park requires playing him regularly.

Which he didnt really do after about 2008.....says it all really.

[dsqpr]

I thought he did a job for us and don't think there is any denying that he played his heart out for us. He was not the impact player I had been expecting but nevertheless I strongly disagreed with much of the criticism he received from many of our fans.

[Yousef]

Ted will be happy he'll be able to bring his dog again

[Norths]

I strongly disagree on the bold part. SAF tried using him as an impact sub 2nd or 3rd season with united but soon found out that getting the most from Park requires playing him regularly.

Which SAF never did as the stats I posted in the loan thread proved.

You cant have it both ways mate.