Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

marlons king n harewood

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Factamondo
    You know when you've been factamondoed!
    • Mar 2009
    • 37198

    #1

    marlons king n harewood

    i say yes!!!!
    you know nothing john snow!!!!
  • BennyBoyRs
    I like 'Lone' time
    • Mar 2009
    • 13695

    #2
    I say they both must have an attitude as they're both black.

    Isn't that the general concensus on any black striker we're linked with?

    Honestly though, they'd both be far better than we currently have IMO.
    Your mum would love me...

    Comment

    • Bigdave
      Gold Seat
      • Apr 2009
      • 5109

      #3
      Not too keen on Harewood but King would be a defo yes pleeeeese, women basher or not.

      Comment

      • qblockpete
        C Club
        • Mar 2009
        • 22186

        #4
        You are joking


        Its getting boring now, but our fans would give Harewood around 70 minutes, before declaring he is s.hite!!
        ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
        THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

        Comment

        • Factamondo
          You know when you've been factamondoed!
          • Mar 2009
          • 37198

          #5
          they would ruffle a few opposition defences and score the goals to see us into a top eight spot im in no doubt!
          you know nothing john snow!!!!

          Comment

          • Factamondo
            You know when you've been factamondoed!
            • Mar 2009
            • 37198

            #6
            Originally posted by qblockpete
            You are joking


            Its getting boring now, but our fans would give Harewood around 70 minutes, before declaring he is s.hite!!
            yet we gave aggyispants 70 games to discover the very same thing.....thought you were a tad harsh there peter my old muckeroo!!!!
            you know nothing john snow!!!!

            Comment

            • Bigdave
              Gold Seat
              • Apr 2009
              • 5109

              #7
              Originally posted by qblockpete
              You are joking


              Its getting boring now, but our fans would give Harewood around 70 minutes, before declaring he is s.hite!!
              Im declaring now he is s hite........................oh and a bad attitude.

              Comment

              • BennyBoyRs
                I like 'Lone' time
                • Mar 2009
                • 13695

                #8
                I don't see what the problem is with Harewood?

                At this Level from 2001 right through until West Ham got promoted, he's had a very good goals to games ratio.

                2001-02 - 11 in 28 = every 2.54 games, putting him on course for 18 over a 46 game season.
                2002-03 - 20 in 46 = evey 2.3 games, putting him on course for 20 over a 46 game season.
                2003-04 (Forest) - 12 in 19 = every 1.58 games, putting him on course for 29 over a 46 game season.
                2003-04 (West Ham) - 13 in 31 = every 2.38 games, putting him on course for 19 over a 46 game season.
                2004-05 - 17 in 48 = every 2.82 games, putting him on course for 16 over a 46 game season.

                The following season saw him get 14 Prem goals in 37 games which is also a good effort.

                Hardly a poor option really.
                Your mum would love me...

                Comment

                • Youvebeenrangered
                  CCG
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 7293

                  #9
                  Either would be fantastic!
                  Cant believe it, ive been PWOPER MUGGED ORF...

                  Comment

                  • Rebel R's
                    King of Pessimism
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 12266

                    #10
                    harewood would be the better of the two,better than Folan,thats for sure.

                    Comment

                    • EDDIE2458
                      Bronze Seat
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 326

                      #11
                      Gotta admit , i'd quite fancy seeing harewood and simpson, although the young gun , proved nowt yet , just got a feeling he gonna come good , and harewood has always scored goals at this level aswell as the prem.....loan him in !!!

                      Comment

                      • norfolk ranger
                        Silver Seat
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 1377

                        #12
                        cant see anything in harewood,just runs about a lot down blind alleys,n we av enough so called strikers who do that already,not keen on king either but as we av left it to l8 once again to bring in quality we av2 make do discussing v pro's n cons of 2 very average players n dont ever get me started bout dj campbell as i av read others tout his name:horror::horror::horror::horror:

                        Comment

                        • qprjames
                          Silver Seat
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 4353

                          #13
                          Would have harewood at the r's, would give us another dimension
                          Now, Then, Forever
                          [CENTER]QPR-Football League CHAMPIONS

                          Comment

                          • qprmarc
                            Silver Seat
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 1942

                            #14
                            get both in, if we are serious about promotion and the board want to show some ambition.

                            Comment

                            • stainrodisalegend
                              Platinum Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 13624

                              #15
                              of course; but they aren't and they don't

                              Comment

                              Working...