Wilkins

[The Merry Ploughboy]

Agent Ray sent in to finish the job Agent Adel started. Bless the Fools, soppy f u cking mongos

[bushcelt1]

That was a long time ago though , experience working with with the best managers would have provided a learning curve

A coach in Wilkins capacity is more about what goes on the training field. Take away Wilkins smashing nicey personality on TV and what you have is a real football man I find it plausible that he is a Premier league coach in standard.

you could be right. some coachs make terrible manangers-steve clarke is ment to be top notch but got the sack at west brom. maybe a case of the new found owners from abroad looking for others to join them-plenty od talent from these shores imo. how no-one takes a punt on hoddle amazes me.

[West Acton]

That was a long time ago though , experience working with with the best managers would have provided a learning curve

A coach in Wilkins capacity is more about what goes on the training field. Take away Wilkins smashing nicey personality on TV and what you have is a real football man I find it plausible that he is a Premier league coach in standard.

Fair points

[MYU]

Please take them down.

[stan_bowles]

I don't rate him and hopefully he is the final nail in their coffin as they now have two coaches in charge there no sign of a proper manager

Got Curbishley upstairs.

[Brightsparx]

Maybe tarbie can be his chauffeur in every day seeming how he got done for drink driving recently. Then he will get in the team 🙊

[West Acton]

Got Curbishley upstairs.

Changed to much for me given the situation they are in. From Jol to Rene+Curbs now Wilkins massive overhaul for team that prob need stability more then anything

[stan_bowles]

Changed to much for me given the situation they are in. From Jol to Rene+Curbs now Wilkins massive overhaul for team that prob need stability more then anything

Seems a common thing with these new,foreign,non-football background owners.

[dsqpr]

Wilkins was the worst manager we have had that I can remember. And I'm OLD!

[stan_bowles]

Wilkins was the worst manager we have had that I can remember. And I'm OLD!

Some stats

Neil Warnock 39.2% wins from 84 games

Ray Harford 12.2% wins from 41 games

Ray Wilkins 38.8% wins from 80 games

Wilkins has a higher win percentage than most ex Rangers managers,but everyone just remembers the relegation.I was surprised by the stats.

[Westway]

Why has Wilkins getting us relegated been erased from every bio I've ever read about the man? Also it never gets mentioned on TV, even when our games were being televised last season and nailed on to go down and Wilkins was in the studio commenting on the game. Nobody ever said, "so Ray, you know what it's like to take QPR down…"
It's been glossed over.

[stan_bowles]

Why has Wilkins getting us relegated been erased from every bio I've ever read about the man? Also it never gets mentioned on TV, even when our games were being televised last season and nailed on to go down and Wilkins was in the studio commenting on the game. Nobody ever said, "so Ray, you know what it's like to take QPR down…"
It's been glossed over.

Why has nobody asked Mark Lawrenson how it feels to take it up the bottle?.

The mysterys of TV punditism.

[vanhoop]

I guarantee ray super Wilkins will take them down.the script for the tabithas and Henriettas has been written.hallelujah!!

[dsqpr]

Some stats

Neil Warnock 39.2% wins from 84 games

Ray Harford 12.2% wins from 41 games

Ray Wilkins 38.8% wins from 80 games

Wilkins has a higher win percentage than most ex Rangers managers,but everyone just remembers the relegation.I was surprised by the stats.

It was actually his attitude that I took issue with.

Also, the stats really need to be for points gained rather than just wins, although it is hard to see Harford overtaking Wilkins once you include the draws! But it might reduce the obvious gap.

[stan_bowles]

It was actually his attitude that I took issue with.

Also, the stats really need to be for points gained rather than just wins, although it is hard to see Harford overtaking Wilkins once you include the draws! But it might reduce the obvious gap.

31 wins,13 draws and 36 losses.

Not sure what that works out at points per game,but almost 50% losses is what cost us.

Harford's was 5 wins lol.