Watford Want Helguson. Southampton Want Ageymang

[stainrodisalegend]

Jim seems a bit soft in this regard, witness his earlier conversation with Vine. Magilton: "We wd like you to go out on loan to gain match fitness."
Vine: "I don't want to go."
Magilton: "OK, you can stay."

Neither are good enough for where we want to be but whenever I - and others - ask who might come the other way we are met by defeaning silence...

[Receed R]

Jim seems a bit soft in this regard, witness his earlier conversation with Vine. Magilton: "We wd like you to go out on loan to gain match fitness."
Vine: "I don't want to go."
Magilton: "OK, you can stay."

Neither are good enough for where we want to be but whenever I - and others - ask who might come the other way we are met by defeaning silence...

dont ask then

[QPR1234]

nobody realise..

if they BOTH go we cant get 2 more in.. heres why:

current loanee's:
taarabt, watson, simpson, heaton

thats 4 loanee's who are guaranteed to be in match day squad..

match day squad cannot have more than 5 loanee's at any time.

so bringing in two strikers unless one is a freebie wont be happening.

back to note:

get rid of agyemang keep helguson purely because he is going to score more goals than pelicori.

[kingy10]

Aggy would cause a lot of problems in League 1.

HH is past it.

[qprjim]

keep HH, whether we like it or not, he is still the best target man we have at the club. When it comes to Dave/wutang/whatever, the sooner he is shipped out the better, never seen a player look so disinterested!

[Youvebeenrangered]

If, and thats a big if, we get rid of both then we must replace them with atleast 1 quality striker. If thats not on the cards then id be more inclinde to keep HH and wave goodbye to agyemang.

[Nodge70]

nobody realise..

if they BOTH go we cant get 2 more in.. heres why:

current loanee's:
taarabt, watson, simpson, heaton

thats 4 loanee's who are guaranteed to be in match day squad..

match day squad cannot have more than 5 loanee's at any time.

so bringing in two strikers unless one is a freebie wont be happening.

back to note:

get rid of agyemang keep helguson purely because he is going to score more goals than pelicori.

Taarabt doesn't count. Season long loans are excluded, I believe. Happy to stand corrected though.

[themodfather]

do they need a lift?
cheerio

[winalotto]

Southampton must be a glutton for punishment...
Keep Helguson unless we have someone in mind to replace him.

[Ads1985]

Nodge if that's true then Simpson is a season long loan too?

[Captain Clunge]

Agyemang would do OK in League One. Helgusson just needs some confidence, but I doubt the Board/fans/manager will have the patience for that.

I just hope we get someone decent lined up before we let them go.

[sirpiechucker]

Agyemang would do OK in League One. Helgusson just needs some confidence, but I doubt the Board/fans/manager will have the patience for that.

I just hope we get someone decent lined up before we let them go.

What like we did with Blackstock???? :devil:

[qpr_yuley]

I would let them both go on loan, and get someone else (hooper, jackson ect)

[sirpiechucker]

I would let them both go on loan, and get someone else (hooper, jackson ect)

Scunny will almost certainly get relegated if they let Hooper go out on loan so there is no benefit in doing so. Unless Gillingham have financial difficulties or Jackson asks to go out on loan then Gillingham too have no reason in allowing him to leave.

If we sign anyone we are more likely to bring in players who clubs don't want or fringe players from the Premiership. Our best bet is someone like Jon Stead, Sam Vokes, Danny Wellbeck, Marlon King, Henri Camara, Marlon Harewood (when fit), Carlos Vela (when fit).

[ollyhoops]

I would loan them both out, if I were them and I knew I had no future at QPR I would jump at the chance as watford and southampton are not bad sides to play for