Ji Sung Park heading to PSV

[Rangers77]

Memo to Rangers 77. What should Park fanboys who wish to stay here do?

Support the team. #### off the team. Perhaps post about something other than Park....?

[vblockranger]

Champagne ready as soon as its official he has left the building! That will be another overpaid useless has-been off the wage bill...well done to the club.

[vblockranger]

Memo to Rangers 77. What should Park fanboys who wish to stay here do?

Well you could cut out comments such as this one you posted earlier

"Cudos to Park for leaving to a better club than QPR."

Doesnt endear you to real QPR fans and makes you look like an away fan..

[Norths]

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11711/8856993

[Yousef]

Why on loan? Can't we sell him?????

[Norths]

Why on loan? Can't we sell him?????

Only has a year left on his contract with us and maybe PSV dont want to commit to more than that?

[Rangers77]

Why on loan? Can't we sell him?????

He's got one year left on his contract. PSV won't pay him what we pay him owing to their salary cap. It seems they're paying him up to their salary cap and we're making up the difference. Its not ideal, but it means we get shot of the no mark....

[stanistheman]

I think it is good to get him off the payroll, but I agree, it is a shame that they didn't sell him, even for a knockdown fee of £200K.

He was a hugely disappointing signing. Can't believe the hype and press conference when parading him as a marquee signing. I had a feeling back then that this would go belly-up just like the Parejo deal which had a similar press coverage/parade.

[FurtiveFox]

Got nothing against Park and if we were short of midfielders would be happy to give him a run after all his niggling injuries last season to see if he improved. However we have midfielders galore, just signed Henry, possibly signed O'Neil and getting linked with various others so also bearing in mind his wages probably best to let him go even if we have to subsidise a bit for the year.

[Dazzer1977]

Why on loan? Can't we sell him?????

Maybe they won't take him on at the wage he's on with us, but PSV have agreed to pay, lets say 70% of his wages. He's in his final year of his contract with us and clearly Harry doesn't fancy him so why not try and get him off the wage bill. Get it now??

[ollyhoops]

I thought o'neil had signed?

So what are we paying towards Park? any ideas?

[Yousef]

Maybe they won't take him on at the wage he's on with us, but PSV have agreed to pay, lets say 70% of his wages. He's in his final year of his contract with us and clearly Harry doesn't fancy him so why not try and get him off the wage bill. Get it now??

Cheers, never realised he was in his last year!

Thanks NothholtRanger and Rangers77.

[ollyhoops]

i would love to know what he is on per week.

[Dazzer1977]

i would love to know what he is on per week.

Why? What really is the hang up with what people earn a week...? Just curious to know that's all.

Probably somewhere around £2.5million a year, but he cost us nothing contrary to what was reported in the press and he's raised the clubs profile in Asia greater than what we could of done by spending £5million on marketing.

[madara]

You I assume include yourself in the fans speculate what SAF thinks and then write it as fact. Since you stated it was a fact SAF wanted Park to stay where as what you are really doing is speculating. Of course all the stories match as it would look silly if they were different and would be ridiculous. As I say what SAF told the media and even Park himself is possibly not what SAF really thought and expressed behind closed doors. Hence you can't claim it is fact SAF wanted Park to stay.


The other factor is if SAF really wanted Park to stay then he probably would of. Not many managers have influence like SAF with regard to the board and players and if he really wanted Park to stay he would have insisted on it. Regardless of the length of service/request to leave etc if it was not in the best interests of Man Utd and SAF then Park would not have left. That is also speculation and not fact I might point out.

Don't put words into my mouth. I said it was a fact SAF said to the media he wanted Park to stay. Further more he said to the media after Park transferred that he regret letting him go.

History is based on stories that match.

SAF has a history of letting loyal players leave when they ask for it. It's not in the best of interest for a club to have a player who wants to leave. This is strictly my opinion.