POLL: Will JFH keep his job or lose it?

[Stanley]

there's just not enough meaty evidence to sack him.

But maybe enough not to renew his rolling contract in December (not to mention fan power factor)...

[Rangers77]

It's looking like Les, Hoos and TF, listed in the order of the folk running the club, might not do the necessary thing immediately. So it's up to us Saturday to force them. Like Hughesless and Southampton at home. And Ramsey and Brebtfird and Derby. If so, let's do it.

[Shepherds Mush]

I can't see him going.

So far it looks like he'll just come out of this looking like one greedy b*stard.

[Hertford Hoop]

Nip and tuck the voting

[stanistheman]

Only two options, I think the club will keep him.

Unfortunately, I agree, but I hope I am wrong.

[stanistheman]

It's looking like Les, Hoos and TF, listed in the order of the folk running the club, might not do the necessary thing immediately. So it's up to us Saturday to force them. Like Hughesless and Southampton at home. And Ramsey and Brebtfird and Derby. If so, let's do it.

I agree. Call for his head from pre kick off til the end (I doubt QPR will at any time look like beating Fulham).

[Kirill]

Nip and tuck the voting

So, to appease both sides, maybe sack him now and later re-hire?
Not that such travesty could ever possibly happen at QPR.
No, wait, I vaguely remember something about Chris Ramsey.

[stanistheman]

But maybe enough not to renew his rolling contract in December (not to mention fan power factor)...

This and the struggle for wins, goals and even the struggle to entertain should be enough to ensure he doesn't get this contract rolled over.

[Tarbie]

I think he's probably like 99% of people in the game. Greedy.

Unfortunately (as I want him gone for his shite football alone) it won't be enough to out him.

Giving players 3 days off. Firstly Warnock was hardly ever at training. That's why they have coaches to cover. Secondly how do we know it's not the norm to give players an extended recovery break? We don't.

Tax issue. Not illegal as far as I can see. Maximizing his profit. We'd all do that if we could.

Sorry but there's just not enough meaty evidence to sack him.

But it's how it's delivered though.

Hasselbaink's words were “It depends what the cheque says, you know? It just depends what has to be done, but if it’s an international week I can give them Sunday, Monday, Tuesday off.” Not "it's international week so the players will be off anyway". He clearly gave the impression that if it was made worth his while, he will put his day job on hold for 3 days to go get paid in Singapore. Maybe he's just using it as negotiation tactic and they would have been off anyway, but you have to say, it really doesn't read well.

For me, the above alone is enough to sack him. It's clear intent to put his own financial gain before the best interests of the club as well as his responsibilities as the clubs manager!

[West London is Rss]

But it's how it's delivered though.

Hasselbaink's words were “It depends what the cheque says, you know? It just depends what has to be done, but if it’s an international week I can give them Sunday, Monday, Tuesday off.” Not "it's international week so the players will be off anyway". He clearly gave the impression that if it was made worth his while, he will put his day job on hold for 3 days to go get paid in Singapore.

Maybe he's just using it as negotiation tactic and they would have been off anyway, but you have to say, it really doesn't read well.

For me, the above alone is enough to sack him. It's clear intent to put his own financial gain before the best interests of the club as well as his responsibilities as the clubs manager!

100%!

He did this as soon as he suggested giving the players 3 days off for him to travel for money.

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

But maybe enough not to renew his rolling contract in December (not to mention fan power factor)...

I would of thought the football enough would see to that. That's what I'm hoping anyway.

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

But it's how it's delivered though.

Hasselbaink's words were “It depends what the cheque says, you know? It just depends what has to be done, but if it’s an international week I can give them Sunday, Monday, Tuesday off.” Not "it's international week so the players will be off anyway". He clearly gave the impression that if it was made worth his while, he will put his day job on hold for 3 days to go get paid in Singapore. Maybe he's just using it as negotiation tactic and they would have been off anyway, but you have to say, it really doesn't read well.

For me, the above alone is enough to sack him. It's clear intent to put his own financial gain before the best interests of the club as well as his responsibilities as the clubs manager!

Last paragraph I agree 100%. Is it sackable though? I'd of thought not. That's my point.

[Tarbie]

Last paragraph I agree 100%. Is it sackable though? I'd of thought not. That's my point.

He's on a 1 year rolling contract mate. Even if it isn't enough to legally terminate his contract (and I believe it is by the way), it's hardly going to break the back to pay him up and send him on his way anyway.

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

He's on a 1 year rolling contract mate. Even if it isn't enough to legally terminate his contract (and I believe it is by the way), it's hardly going to break the back to pay him up and send him on his way anyway.

Thats true. Ties in with my thread last night about this could be a get out of jail card for Les.

[skranger]

He's got to go ,,, it will not be a great loss