Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Austin Auction begins...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Garyd73 View Post
    There is no saying he will be sold to the highest bidder if QPR accept the offer. The player will also decide, for arguments sake lets say he wants to stay in London and Chelsea offer £10m and WHU £12m. Southampton may have bid £18m and Newcastle £15m.

    If we accept Southampton's offer Charlie may say no I don't want to go to them and the same to Newcastle. We then end up with a choice of accepting £12m and Charlie agreeing to go, then queue melt down that we didn't hold out for more and how the club is ####.
    Then we put him in a position where we only accept the bid from the club offering the most and make it quite clear you go there or you stay and play in the championship your choice Charlie or you drop your terms and what they save in wages on you they can put on the transfer fee

    It does not have to be QPR bending over backwards if he wants out he has his part to play too

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Hitman34 View Post
      west ham refusing to spend 15 mil on austin

      London24 Sport ✔ @London24Sport
      #WHUFC are not interested in paying £15m for this man, according to reports.
      Full story: http://bit.ly/1H5M5ih #QPR
      Yeah we all know their freeloaders. Already got the Olympic stadium for next to nothing and £2m a year rent now they want players on the cheap too. Tell the p orn kings (Gold and sullivan) to go and f uck someone else as Rangers are not up for having their bellies tickled anymore

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by West Acton View Post
        Then we put him in a position where we only accept the bid from the club offering the most and make it quite clear you go there or you stay and play in the championship your choice Charlie or you drop your terms and what they save in wages on you they can put on the transfer fee

        It does not have to be QPR bending over backwards if he wants out he has his part to play too

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Garyd73 View Post
          There is no saying he will be sold to the highest bidder if QPR accept the offer. The player will also decide, for arguments sake lets say he wants to stay in London and Chelsea offer £10m and WHU £12m. Southampton may have bid £18m and Newcastle £15m.

          If we accept Southampton's offer Charlie may say no I don't want to go to them and the same to Newcastle. We then end up with a choice of accepting £12m and Charlie agreeing to go, then queue melt down that we didn't hold out for more and how the club is ####.
          For me the club should hold out for the 15m regardless. Charlie is worth it and the opening bid of 10m suggests to me that somebody will pay it for him. If Charlie doesn't want to go to Saints or Newcastle then he can stay and get us promoted next season, that's worth more than 15m anyway even if he f*cks off for a free in June!
          Last edited by Tarbie; 22-06-2015, 12:43 PM.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by West Acton View Post
            Then we put him in a position where we only accept the bid from the club offering the most and make it quite clear you go there or you stay and play in the championship your choice Charlie or you drop your terms and what they save in wages on you they can put on the transfer fee

            It does not have to be QPR bending over backwards if he wants out he has his part to play too
            Ideally yes we would and this is how transfers were handled in the past, however not anymore. If Newcastle were the highest bidders and his wife didn't want to leave her family and the kids have started schools in the south you can't say go to Newcastle or you get nothing. You then have a very pissed off player and agent who won't want to put other players into our club.

            If Austin won't go and mopes around until January when he will leave for £2-4m and do nothing for us.

            Also we don't know what agreements may have been made with him about if we get relegated etc.

            Comment


            • #21
              I remember when tricky went to west ham, we were robbed blind. Hope it doesn't happen with Charlie.
              Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Garyd73 View Post
                Ideally yes we would and this is how transfers were handled in the past, however not anymore. If Newcastle were the highest bidders and his wife didn't want to leave her family and the kids have started schools in the south you can't say go to Newcastle or you get nothing. You then have a very pissed off player and agent who won't want to put other players into our club.

                If Austin won't go and mopes around until January when he will leave for £2-4m and do nothing for us.

                Also we don't know what agreements may have been made with him about if we get relegated etc.
                Can't see Charlie harming his career or us like that.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by West Acton View Post
                  Then we put him in a position where we only accept the bid from the club offering the most and make it quite clear you go there or you stay and play in the championship your choice Charlie or you drop your terms and what they save in wages on you they can put on the transfer fee

                  It does not have to be QPR bending over backwards if he wants out he has his part to play too
                  I totally agree.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Garyd73 View Post
                    Ideally yes we would and this is how transfers were handled in the past, however not anymore. If Newcastle were the highest bidders and his wife didn't want to leave her family and the kids have started schools in the south you can't say go to Newcastle or you get nothing. You then have a very pissed off player and agent who won't want to put other players into our club.

                    If Austin won't go and mopes around until January when he will leave for £2-4m and do nothing for us.

                    Also we don't know what agreements may have been made with him about if we get relegated etc.
                    he wouldn't do that for 2 reasons
                    he isn't that way inclined
                    and he would want to stay at the top of his game in order to be selected for the Euro finals next summer.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I can see this one rolling on and on, a la Remy.
                      You can bet your last pound that we will get shafted on his price.
                      Man Utd reportedly interested in Kane for £40M so in my book Chaz is well worth £20-£25M...Homegrown...18 goals for a relegated team...an outstanding goals-games record.
                      Can see Spurs selling Kane for £40M and buying CA for around £10-£15M. a nice tidy profit and a very similar replacement (if not better).
                      Just hope the club brings in his replacement/s sooner rather than later.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Love how peoples reasoning is based on Charlie's character as if they know him personally and he is the rare exception in modern football that doesn't look after his own interests

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Hove Ranger View Post
                          Love how peoples reasoning is based on Charlie's character as if they know him personally and he is the rare exception in modern football that doesn't look after his own interests
                          It's based on a number of things including his background work ethic, and how he has conducted himself at previous clubs as well as at QPR. No one has spoken out against him as having cause issues or problems, unlike other players.

                          As for moping around, he wont do that as he would want to impress the England manager as well as future buyers.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            He does seem like a sound lad but if your employer told you, your wife and your young kids to #### off up to Newcastle for 3 years or you can stay in a #### job you wouldn't be that happy after everything you have done for them. This is all hypothetical anyway, just an example of how the biggest bid may now win the day and we may have to take less.

                            It's also possible the biggest bidder will be a club he wants to go to so no worries then.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Whatever happens, I just hope that we have a contingency plan. We really cant afford another Remy situation where Charlie gets transferred in the last kickings of transfer deadline day and we get left with nothing or worse, shafted for a massive fee for someone who isn't worth it to replace Charlie.
                              Someone please tell me just this once, we'll get our transfers sorted before its all too late/expensive.....please!!
                              2011-2013, 2 seasons in the Premiership, 76 games, 14 wins........two years of my life I'll never get back!!

                              2013/2014 mediocrity topped off with a win at Wembley....

                              2014/2015 was pretty much the same as 2011-2013.....

                              2015/2016, average at best.....

                              2016/2017, same old, same old....

                              2017/2018, aim low, avoid disappointment!

                              Its the hope that kills you!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Garyd73 View Post
                                He does seem like a sound lad but if your employer told you, your wife and your young kids to #### off up to Newcastle for 3 years or you can stay in a #### job you wouldn't be that happy after everything you have done for them. This is all hypothetical anyway, just an example of how the biggest bid may now win the day and we may have to take less.

                                It's also possible the biggest bidder will be a club he wants to go to so no worries then.
                                It's called 'how to run a proper business'. For too long this club has rolled over and got shafted over transfers, and for too long it's been about player/agent power. It's about time we took a leaf out of Daniel Levy's book and his ilk.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X