Latest from cernyberny

[stan_bowles]

More drivel from wannabe ITK's.

[BUSHRANGER1982]

*YAWN*

Is it that time already?

[Yousef]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[QPRwill]

It wouldn't be Briatore selling to the highest bidder, it would surely be Ecclestone?

[stan_bowles]

It wouldn't be Briatore selling to the highest bidder, it would surely be Ecclestone?

Maybe Bernie's left Flavio in charge of finding a buyer while he does his F1 thing.

[3London]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Oh so its alright for you to do it!!!!

[Yousef]

Oh so its alright for you to do it!!!!

Thanks for teaching me

[Ric-Roc]

Of course the club will be sold to the highest bidder. That's common business practice isn't it?!

If reports are to be believed the Mittals had the chance to buy the majority of shares over a year ago & declined so if true I have no sympathy for them. If someone bids higher than them then it shows that person wants the club more & that's good enough for me.

I was very pro Mittals / Bhatia but I'm starting to think they talked the talk & that was about it.

[James1979]

Yep 30m is a pisstake offer. If someone came an offered you about a 70% discount to the price you wanted, I'm surprised if you'd speak to them again

[acricketer]

Yep 30m is a pisstake offer. If someone came an offered you about a 70% discount to the price you wanted, I'm surprised if you'd speak to them again

If someone comes in from out of the blue, 30m is an example of a well known opening negotiation gambit. Go in really low and you might have a better chance of getting a deal closer to 30m than if you had gone in at 40 or 50.

If you are in a business relationship and all parties have a realistic view of the true situation then a low offer is an insult. Either naivete on the Mittals part or chancing their arm because they really don't give a fig. Either way T&C will make them pay if they still want the club.

[stan_bowles]

Typical Indians really.All want something for nothing.

[MattyRangers]

Of course the club will be sold to the highest bidder. That's common business practice isn't it?!

If reports are to be believed the Mittals had the chance to buy the majority of shares over a year ago & declined so if true I have no sympathy for them. If someone bids higher than them then it shows that person wants the club more & that's good enough for me.

I was very pro Mittals / Bhatia but I'm starting to think they talked the talk & that was about it.

exactly what i thought! hardly going to sell to the bidder with the shiniest shoes is he...

[stan_bowles]

True though Eastcote.

Work with enough of them and they are the tightest,money grabbing kants you could meet.

[singingranger]

Of course the club will be sold to the highest bidder. That's common business practice isn't it?!

If reports are to be believed the Mittals had the chance to buy the majority of shares over a year ago & declined so if true I have no sympathy for them. If someone bids higher than them then it shows that person wants the club more & that's good enough for me.

I was very pro Mittals / Bhatia but I'm starting to think they talked the talk & that was about it.

Ric,

not sure what the Mittals bid, The mail says 50m some say 30m maybe we'll never know, the successfull purchaser is buying 63 percent of Premiership status. Thats all we have, there is nothing else about the facilities that are premiership.

if we moved ground that would probably cost something like 200m, that would need to be funded by the new owners!

if they have or anyone has bid 50m that is a fair price in my eyes.

It could be possible that it has become very personal between all parties

[DeepcutHoop]

True though Eastcote.

Work with enough of them and they are the tightest,money grabbing kants you could meet.

And apparently all QPR fans are casual racists. There's plenty on here, and therefore all of them are.

I'd be more inclined to believe he didn't throw money away, based on him having absolutely loads of it.