Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

When's Captain Park Back?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • vblockranger
    replied
    i reckon he is tied to Joons bed

    Leave a comment:


  • knocker
    replied
    60 posts and still no answer. Where The Fu ck. Is He.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Yousef
    Come on 59 posts!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Yousef
    replied
    Come on 59 posts!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Joon
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    because i am a fan of QPR while you are a fan of an individual who cant get a game for my club. No different than an away fan imo.
    I am a fan of QPR, and I am also a fan of its players, including Park, who led me to this club in the first place. I have said more times before than I care to repeat, so this is the last time I will tell you, you have zero authority on the matter of who is a fan of QPR and who is not, except in the case of your own self.

    The same applies to all international fans of QPR. Who do you think you are anyway? Tony Fernandez? :x_x:
    Last edited by Joon; 31-12-2012, 09:12 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Joon
    I'm here following and supporting QPR, so why would I be discussing upcoming new stars that are not attached to QPR, at this forum?
    because i am a fan of QPR while you are a fan of an individual who cant get a game for my club. No different than an away fan imo.

    Leave a comment:


  • bonheurjh
    replied
    Originally posted by Yousef
    Hang on, no need to rush. Let's wait and see If Park really wants to play for QPR when we go down!
    This thread must end here

    I agree Park hardly featured at QPR, but at the same time, there are other players to be blamed for getting paid insanely alot doing nth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yousef
    replied
    Hang on, no need to rush. Let's wait and see If Park really wants to play for QPR when we go down!

    Leave a comment:


  • Joon
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    we do anyhow so Park will still earn thousands of pounds for doing nothing. He is past it now , move on to someone else. Korea must have an up and coming new star?
    I'm here following and supporting QPR, so why would I be discussing upcoming new stars that are not attached to QPR, at this forum?

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Joon
    Look who's talking facts now? :p

    As you said earlier let's agree to disagree on how much playing time Park would have gotten if he stayed at Manchester United. That part is just speculation anyway, although I doubt they keep players on payroll to not give them ANY game time
    we do anyhow so Park will still earn thousands of pounds for doing nothing. He is past it now , move on to someone else. Korea must have an up and coming new star?

    Leave a comment:


  • Joon
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    Cant mate, QPR are my team. Your just a fly by night. Park wouldnt have got ANY game time for United and they was right to get rid of him. Its just facts but you dont like to see it because he is your hero. Understandable.
    Look who's talking facts now? :p

    As you said earlier let's agree to disagree on how much playing time Park would have gotten if he stayed at Manchester United. That part is just speculation anyway, although I doubt they keep players on payroll to not give them ANY game time.

    And as for QPR being your team, it is mine too. You don't own it, you know.

    Leave a comment:


  • SuperHoopNik
    replied
    SAF might have said to Park that he wants him to stay even though he won't get as much time - just to be nice , but really he just wanted him gone if you think about it. They've been planning that Kagawa signing for about a year before Park left so they were obviously trying to replace him. Also with the amount of midfielders they have now (Valencia, Nani, Cleverley, Anderson, Scholes, Powell and Kagawa.), I don't think Park would ever get a game.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Joon
    Wouldn't have started any games for United? No, he would have started a good number of "big" games, and subbed for many others. That part we can agree to disagree on.

    As for Swansea, why don't you go and I stay?
    Cant mate, QPR are my team. Your just a fly by night. Park wouldnt have got ANY game time for United and they was right to get rid of him. Its just facts but you dont like to see it because he is your hero. Understandable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joon
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    Wouldnt have started any games for United...just not good enough hence he now "plays" for us. In fact imo he wouldnt have got any game time at United and Fergie knew it which is why he was "allowed" to leave. And now we right back at the start again :-) . I'm off to bed and lets just agree to disagree :-) Go support that Korean at Swansea (not getting many games either tho is he? ) be a lot less stressful than following QPR.
    Wouldn't have started any games for United? No, he would have started a good number of "big" games, and subbed for many others. That part we can agree to disagree on.

    As for Swansea, why don't you go and I stay?

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Joon
    He was not as good as he used to be, but he would still have been useful as a sub and big game starter, which is why SAF still wanted him to stay.
    Wouldnt have started any games for United...just not good enough hence he now "plays" for us. In fact imo he wouldnt have got any game time at United and Fergie knew it which is why he was "allowed" to leave. And now we right back at the start again :-) . I'm off to bed and lets just agree to disagree :-) Go support that Korean at Swansea (not getting many games either tho is he? ) be a lot less stressful than following QPR.
    Last edited by vblockranger; 31-12-2012, 01:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...