No Chery, no Luongo. Three points.

[Rangers77]

Luongo's out of today's game.

Three points then.

[Awin]

Luongo is a drongo who should be playing bongo. He takes far too longo to ping a pass that's (usually) wrongo.

Ted watch out!

[Hubble]

Luongo is a drongo who should be playing bongo. He takes far too longo to ping a pass that's (usually) wrongo.

[kenthoop]

Luongo's out of today's game.

[corbray]

Nah luongos no where near as good as makekelelelelelelele nass

[nasser95]

Mate, Makelele played for some of the biggest clubs in the world, was strong as an Ox, completely dominated midfields at the highest level of the game and was told never to cross the half way line at Chelsea cos that wasn't his job. He is in no way anywhere near comparable to Luongo who tho I know you really rate has done nothing other that standard Championship performances and flirting with the edges of games at this level.

He needs to step up from here. Hopefully he will.

Mate, cmon, please read what I said regarding Makelele ffs...

The makelele one wasn't about Luongo being as good as makelele, it was about him going through a similar experience of being told he wasn't what they wanted him to be

This is the shi t that makes me seem like I'm talking down to people when I'm just having to re-explain what I just said. I'm not comparing their talent, or style or quality in this case, I'm comparing their experience

There are other cases where I will compare their style, but not their Quality. I don't compare quality because it's stupid to, we're in the championship ffs.

[bakes8]

See, I don't think he's quite as good as you may think he is, but my biggest issue with him is that he's a guaranteed substitution. If anything goes wrong, we only have 2 other subs to make and that puts us at an immediate tactical disadvantage.

I was hoping that with match fitness he would be able to play 90mins at least once a week. I'm not sure that's possible now, but I live in hope. HNY anyway.

[bakes8]

Also, what is this ridiculous complaining about comparisons? I'm not comparing their quality ffs, I'm comparing their style of play. I'm comparing the experiences they've been through. The makelele one wasn't about Luongo being as good as makelele, it was about him going through a similar experience of being told he wasn't what they wanted him to be. Scholes was one I didn't even bring up because they are much more different players. I'd say Scholes' style is more similar to someone like Faurlin etc. But again, not talking about their bl oody talent, just the style. People get offended by the weirdest sh it, since when did comparing styles become such a taboo ffs.

Mate, Makelele played for some of the biggest clubs in the world, was strong as an Ox, completely dominated midfields at the highest level of the game and was told never to cross the half way line at Chelsea cos that wasn't his job. He is in no way anywhere near comparable to Luongo who tho I know you really rate has done nothing other that standard Championship performances and flirting with the edges of games at this level.

He needs to step up from here. Hopefully he will.

[nasser95]

Haha, yeh mate unfortunately I make you right.

I really like Sandro and if fit he's miles our best player. Think I'm giving up hope of seeing a fully fit Sandro anymore tho.

See, I don't think he's quite as good as you may think he is, but my biggest issue with him is that he's a guaranteed substitution. If anything goes wrong, we only have 2 other subs to make and that puts us at an immediate tactical disadvantage.

[bakes8]

He can barely play once in one day

Haha, yeh mate unfortunately I make you right.

I really like Sandro and if fit he's miles our best player. Think I'm giving up hope of seeing a fully fit Sandro anymore tho.

[nasser95]

Also, what is this ridiculous complaining about comparisons? I'm not comparing their quality ffs, I'm comparing their style of play. I'm comparing the experiences they've been through. The makelele one wasn't about Luongo being as good as makelele, it was about him going through a similar experience of being told he wasn't what they wanted him to be. Scholes was one I didn't even bring up because they are much more different players. I'd say Scholes' style is more similar to someone like Faurlin etc. But again, not talking about their bl oody talent, just the style. People get offended by the weirdest sh it, since when did comparing styles become such a taboo ffs.

[nasser95]

Ppppppppppppppppppppppppppplease no more comparisons.

Hopefully he will do the job if required today. Personally I'd be starting with the same side if possible (guess no-kness cant play twice in 3 days).

He can barely play once in one day

[bakes8]

Ppppppppppppppppppppppppppplease no more comparisons.

Hopefully he will do the job if required today. Personally I'd be starting with the same side if possible (guess no-kness cant play twice in 3 days).

[Alanwycombe]

Paul Scholes was famously good at winning the ball back wasn't he? Never mistimed tackles, did he?

He didn't mistime tackles he was a dirty little sod who knew exactly what he was doing. Great player doing the job he was given to do by Ferguson.

[1973 ranger]

I know it is the festive season but speaking about luongo in the same breath as one of the best players that ever played for Man Utd is taking the ####. Luongo has ability and is most likely better than he has shown so far but that is it no comparisons to any of the names being bandied about on here. I see him in a more advanced role due to him being two footed and the ability is there to go past people. Not strong or imposing enough for me in a midfield two though.