Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sandro

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shania
    replied
    Originally posted by Timmy the Doc View Post
    Have to agree with you. Terrible mistake turning without touching the ball - schoolboy error. Clint can only pass downwards or hoof, not Premiership standard at all. When we have our next game without Henry, Barton and Hill we may have a good chance to win.
    2 mistakes in how many games? Hardly a liabilty. Barton and Hill, should not have been in the team. Poor Hill; Harry Recrap is ruining Hills Legacy game by game now.

    Sandro if he is able to play at all this season must play With Fer and Henry(or a loan player)
    Last edited by Shania; 01-02-2015, 03:06 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rangers77
    replied
    Originally posted by MYU View Post
    When Joey was out of the team we started picking up wins at home, and when he came back it kind of stopped.
    Am thinking this...... Sandro and Kelvin in 4231 for me. Fer in the middle with two wide players, one of whom sometimes tucks in behind or beside Charlie. If we get a decent striker in then 442 with Sandro and Fer in the middle. But heigh oh that crocked p ussy cat won't probably last twenty minutes, will he.

    Leave a comment:


  • MYU
    replied
    When Joey was out of the team we started picking up wins at home, and when he came back it kind of stopped.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yousef
    replied
    Henry does the basic things but Sandro does better in terms of attacking sometimes. In the PL you need more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jimmy Floyd Rabbit
    replied
    How many mins has Sandro actually played since signing?

    Massive waste of resources. Shock.

    Leave a comment:


  • West Acton
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop View Post
    The reason I'd play that midfield 3 Richard would be to help protect the defence more. We allow the other team to run at us far to easily with just 2 center mids.

    Hopefully by sticking those 3 in the middle would mean we could push our wingers further forward. Chelsea, arsenal, Liverpool,southampton, Tottenham all play one up top and if done right then it doesn't isolate the striker
    I would go three in middle too but to get in two up top I would revert to three at the back which was original plan and play with wing backs as Isla and Yun can play this role with ease.

    When we tried three at the back initially silly b ollocks done it with wrong personnel so it was always going to go wrong. Caulker and Nedum play either side then you choose one of Dunne or Rio in the middle even rotate them; that's how it should have been from day one not Dunne and Rio together that pairing was never going to work

    Leave a comment:


  • rickyranger
    replied
    Neither Barton or Henry have legs, and that along with the fact we also have Hill and Dunne in the team who have the same problem means we will always concede goals. Add to that a goalkeeper who doesn't communicate or organise and can't move his feet quick enough and that's why we loose games on a regular basis not rocket science

    Leave a comment:


  • Bigdave
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop View Post
    West i don't think we should bin Henry I just personally think he is a weak link for us. Sandro and barton in the center with leroy fer in front would be my preference
    So what does Barton give us that Henry doesn't? Looking forward to your answer ablock

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarbie
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop View Post
    My opinion and what I feel a valid one. Karl Henry and Clint hill weren't excatly pulling up trees in the prem in their prime let alone now they are into their 30's. Tbf I'd go as far as saying that they wouldn't even get on another premier leagues bench. Clint would hardly get in a championship team. Love the heart they show but they have no quality,
    Hard to disagree with that to be fair!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ablockhoop
    replied
    The reason I'd play that midfield 3 Richard would be to help protect the defence more. We allow the other team to run at us far to easily with just 2 center mids.

    Hopefully by sticking those 3 in the middle would mean we could push our wingers further forward. Chelsea, arsenal, Liverpool,southampton, Tottenham all play one up top and if done right then it doesn't isolate the striker

    Leave a comment:


  • QPR Richard
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop View Post
    West i don't think we should bin Henry I just personally think he is a weak link for us. Sandro and barton in the center with leroy fer in front would be my preference
    If you do that then you have to play Charlie up front on his own, which is a no-go for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Timmy the Doc
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop View Post
    Drop Henry more like. Looked a far better team without him. Never a prem player. As soon as Clint and Henry are replaced we can potentially start winning again
    Have to agree with you. Terrible mistake turning without touching the ball - schoolboy error. Clint can only pass downwards or hoof, not Premiership standard at all. When we have our next game without Henry, Barton and Hill we may have a good chance to win.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ablockhoop
    replied
    West i don't think we should bin Henry I just personally think he is a weak link for us. Sandro and barton in the center with leroy fer in front would be my preference

    Leave a comment:


  • West Acton
    replied
    Hill yes gives all but offers nothing offensively. Personally think your being harsh on Henry

    Leave a comment:


  • THE CAT
    replied
    We were told he was going to be back today, are we sure it's not another setback?

    Not exactly proving good value is he.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X