Sandro

[MYU]

I didn't want us to sign Sandro for this reason, I mean Spurs only sold him because they know he'll be out again. Why Harry paid so much for him I will never know?

He could've got him for half we spent on him, still would've been wasted money to be fair.

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

He's got a terrible record Stan. Going back a good bit. Can't all be from heavy tackles?

He's a sicknote imo.

[Stanley]

Bang on mate.

Bit of a Sandro w@nk fest for some reason. But to be fair to the posters its most likely out of pure desperation & clinging onto the fact we MIGHT have an option to improve us. Being honest I don't see it. Spurs saw us coming getting rid of the glass man & collecting 6 million sovs at the same time. We got rumped. Again.

IMO, its not that he's made of glass, its just that he's too reckless in the tackle and therefore increases his chances of injury. Faurlin had exactly the same problem and look how he ended up.

So it comes back to poor coaching, not spotting and eradicating these weaknesses in players' games.

[QPR1234]

get fer in the middle. only midfielder who can carry the ball from the middle.

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

Jimmy, I'm with you on this one. People on here talking, as if Sandro is going to be the answer to everything and assuming that the team is going to be so much better for his return. Really???

His QPR appearances this season: 8

Games in which he actually completed 90 minutes: 2 (Villa home; Chelsea away)

Yellow cards: 2

Points gained with him in the team: 4 (Villa, home win; Man City, home draw)


I haven't checked, but I bet Barton's & Henry's stats are better than that! And they're getting slated!

Bang on mate.

Bit of a Sandro w@nk fest for some reason. But to be fair to the posters its most likely out of pure desperation & clinging onto the fact we MIGHT have an option to improve us. Being honest I don't see it. Spurs saw us coming getting rid of the glass man & collecting 6 million sovs at the same time. We got rumped. Again.

[72bus]

Simple Hill backs off because of his lack of pace, its been our lack of pace as a team that has done for us so far
this season.

and the players with pace phillips and hoilett have been cack

Hill is shocking defensively as well these days. At least 3 times in that first half he committed himself by lunging in and got nowhere near the player who walked past him. He also backs off more often than not far too much. Example being the Swansea game where he cost us the game by letting Ki come from the their right touch line all the way inside and along he box to slip the ball to Bony to score.... Why's he backing off so much to allow it! It want as if Ki has tricks like Ronaldo FFS.

Hill is a liability and has been for years now. Always gifts stupid free kicks too.

Simple Hill backs off because of his lack of pace, its been our lack of pace as a team that has done for us so far
this season.

[The Lurker]

How many mins has Sandro actually played since signing?

Massive waste of resources. Shock.

Jimmy, I'm with you on this one. People on here talking, as if Sandro is going to be the answer to everything and assuming that the team is going to be so much better for his return. Really???

His QPR appearances this season: 8

Games in which he actually completed 90 minutes: 2 (Villa home; Chelsea away)

Yellow cards: 2

Points gained with him in the team: 4 (Villa, home win; Man City, home draw)


I haven't checked, but I bet Barton's & Henry's stats are better than that! And they're getting slated!

[72bus]

[QUOTE=dogsrrs;1379735]Not true wolves need him off the wage bill[/QUOT who told you that

[dogsrrs]

henry came from then div 1 wolves as they deemed him surplus to requirements or not good enough , yes he has put in the odd good performance but no way is he good enough at this level

Not true wolves need him off the wage bill

[72bus]

Drop Henry more like. Looked a far better team without him. Never a prem player. As soon as Clint and Henry are replaced we can potentially start winning again

henry came from then div 1 wolves as they deemed him surplus to requirements or not good enough , yes he has put in the odd good performance but no way is he good enough at this level

[SteveQPR1975]

Triffic player

[QPRWEBBIE]

I can't believe some of the comments on Henry, it was only 2 or 3 weeks ago people were shouting from the roof tops about his performances and his been the surprise of the season, the bloke makes 1 mistake and now he should be dropped. Unfortunately Carlsberg don't make footballers

[hal9thou]

So what does Barton give us that Henry doesn't? Looking forward to your answer ablock

better dead ball player

[Del]

Hill yes gives all but offers nothing offensively. Personally think your being harsh on Henry

Hill is shocking defensively as well these days. At least 3 times in that first half he committed himself by lunging in and got nowhere near the player who walked past him. He also backs off more often than not far too much. Example being the Swansea game where he cost us the game by letting Ki come from the their right touch line all the way inside and along he box to slip the ball to Bony to score.... Why's he backing off so much to allow it! It want as if Ki has tricks like Ronaldo FFS.

Hill is a liability and has been for years now. Always gifts stupid free kicks too.