Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Video vs Fulham
Collapse
X
-
I'm not 100 percent sure on this, but with that second pen, Ned's leg is below his waist and he's following the ball. Seemed harsh to me but that just might be my bias as an R."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
Hey stat man. Going by reports, radio commentry and shot stats only, we were absolutly murdered i reckon.Originally posted by nasser95 View PostI'm not 100 percent sure on this, but with that second pen, Ned's leg is below his waist and he's following the ball. Seemed harsh to me but that just might be my bias as an R.
But acording to acts and a couple of others, i was wrong with my assumption.
Could you post up a full list of stats for todays game on this thread please, including posession, shots, areas of play, passes etc etc.
Many thanks.nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
Comment
-
Those are very rarely given, ref must dislike us to give that especially as it was a 2nd of the game.Originally posted by nasser95 View PostI'm not 100 percent sure on this, but with that second pen, Ned's leg is below his waist and he's following the ball. Seemed harsh to me but that just might be my bias as an R.
Comment
-
Always found it odd how he was allowed to ref our game up at old Trafford, despite us being involved in a relegation battle with Bolton the team he supports. He screwed us over that day.Originally posted by jfish View PostThose are very rarely given, ref must dislike us to give that especially as it was a 2nd of the game.
Comment
-
The footage missed a huge amount of our chances. We had 7 shots on target to their 6 and looked just as dangerous whenever we got into their half. They just took loads of shots.Originally posted by Rebel R's View PostOn that evidence Fulham should have won 6-2, we appear to have been very lucky today"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
exactly what nass said, they took loads of shots. but in the 2nd half, we had loads of moves attacking into their final 1/3rd. which i guess is an implication in itself that rangers need to finish off those moves with at least an attempt on target and force the keeper to do somethingRangers Til I Die
follow me at twitter.com/arthurqpr
Comment
-
I was there too, and I don't think rode our luck is the right word. The match was very very open. There were periods where we dominated and periods where they did. They countered a lot and that made it look like we were generally much more in trouble than we actually were throughout the match.Originally posted by 1973 ranger View PostThe general feeling on here from those who were there was we rode our luck. Nothing wrong with that as we left winning a game that could have gone the other way."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
Comment