If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
i might sound like someone who knows nothing with this statement, i dont understand why the hell y the likes of liverpool buys kids of raheems age?
there should be something put in place to make sure that young players stay at there parent club and not allowed to be approached until 17 yrs old minimum.
that player could of not only featured for us but turned the whole clubs fortune as in revenue, popularity (with him being english) and went on to have a very long lasting succsesful career,
insted of sitting arround in liverpools reserves playing games in a park with guys he is obviously head and shoulders above.
i can understand the power of prem clubs and the dreams of young players
however i think prem clubs shouldnt be allowed to approach players of this age because it ruins englands international progress because raheem aint the only one
that conner wickham will be gone into the reserves soon same as that guy we let go to totenham dean parrot?
i think prem clubs should be able to track the progress of a youngster but not be able to buy them
Comment