I find this guy too greedy, he could've passed the ball twice against Sunderland but wanted to go alone. This could cost us vital points in the coming games, hope CR has a word with him.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Zarate
Collapse
X
-
Against sunderland i thought he was fine. when phillips went off and swp came on zarate became the only player who could carry the ball up field.
Against southampton I agree he could've let the ball go long before. As long as he doesnt lose possesion i'm not as fussed.Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Please Follow My Twitter
-
The point made was that on a few occasions he had the Opportunity to Lay the ball off to others in better positions and he didn't.
It's not about giving the guy a chance, it's about the decisions he made while playing, they where poor decisions that fortunately didn't come back to bite us for a change.
You can put forward opinions based on what you have seen!Kept the faith!
Comment
-
Originally posted by californiahoop View PostThe point made was that on a few occasions he had the Opportunity to Lay the ball off to others in better positions and he didn't.
It's not about giving the guy a chance, it's about the decisions he made while playing, they where poor decisions that fortunately didn't come back to bite us for a change.
You can put forward opinions based on what you have seen!
Comment
-
Originally posted by californiahoop View PostThe point made was that on a few occasions he had the Opportunity to Lay the ball off to others in better positions and he didn't.
It's not about giving the guy a chance, it's about the decisions he made while playing, they where poor decisions that fortunately didn't come back to bite us for a change.
You can put forward opinions based on what you have seen!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hubble View PostAnd my point is you haven't seen enough to make an informed opinion.
Not saying he's a bad player, I like the energy but sometimes you need to pass the ball to score.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GaxZE View PostAgainst sunderland i thought he was fine. when phillips went off and swp came on zarate became the only player who could carry the ball up field.
Against southampton I agree he could've let the ball go long before. As long as he doesnt lose possesion i'm not as fussed.
I said many times before the problem with most loans is they arent playing with the clubs best interests in mind, hence dont lay a square ball for a team mate to tap in and secure points etc. They dont care for our plight as most move on and it wont affect them next season, hence they tend to play for themselves to get noticed and make headlines and try to score worldies to do so.
Also, you say as long as he doesnt lose posession you 're not fussed..... what exactly do you call it then when he has a pointless shot which gifts them the ball back?Last edited by Del; 18-02-2015, 04:54 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GaxZE View PostAgainst sunderland i thought he was fine. when phillips went off and swp came on zarate became the only player who could carry the ball up field.
Against southampton I agree he could've let the ball go long before. As long as he doesnt lose possesion i'm not as fussed.
There was only one fly in the ointment in that the pr@tt that carried the ball then elected to pass in his own half and got caught out
Comment
Comment