QPR1st statement

Sorry we had our opportunity to vocally support the manager and we never did.

Sorry those are the facts.

Eh - you're not saying the board make a decision on the basis of whether a manager's name is easy to fit into a chant, including their own???:amazing:

Do they not take into consideration the support given by all the supporter groups and even on this very message board?

Poor show Pete, poor show...

[HammersmithR]

Gareth will do everything Flavio tells him to do. Becoming a yes man.

[Minty]

www.qpr1st.com

or link from homepage on .co.uk Website is currently going through an upgrade and is spread over the 2 domains at the moment.

Thank you Peter. ;D


I thought I was going mad!

[davman]

and here's the crux... If you sack one person for one thing and let another one off for the same thing, its discrimination pure and simple. Anyone with a shred of intelligence knows that,ut not our leaders. There is no way on earth they can challenge that in court, yet they decide to cite that as a reason for PS's dismissal.

The board is full of imbeciles and I am shocked that is the case...

[PeterG]

https://www.qpr1st.com

or link from homepage on .co.uk Website is currently going through an upgrade and is spread over the 2 domains at the moment.

[Minty]

Where can I read this QPR 1st Statement? I can't find it on their website.

Thanks.

[NorwegianRanger]

final icing on the cake for me was watching at Swansea, for Dowie.

look if a manager is not going to progress the team, do we keep them because we cannot keep changing managers?

Gareth Ainsworth is still here for a reason, don't you think? because he is a motivator and a b.loody good person

The only reason Gareth is still here is because he always says YES to Flavio...

[Neo]

Do you think that if the footie was entertaining and we were in the same league position,this wouldn't have happened?

yes

[C.Mongler]

Those comments come from so far out of the Leftfield, thats its actually difficult to respond in any rational sense of the word.

I quite agree.

I remember being at Cardiff away and singing "Paulo Sousa's Blue Army" for about half an hour...

[qblockpete]

andyb

you could be right, but think alot more goes on behind the scenes than we know about.

[swanleyhoop]

The "inconsistent" bit relates to the reasons given for dismissal as applied to ALL employees. i.e. NOT!

Exactly the point I, and a few others, have been trying to make.
Why should some people be privy to info, and tease us with it, yet their sources go unpunished?
It makes no difference whether they put it on the boards or not (although often it is, quite explicitly), the fact that someone has given out (here comes that phrase again) "sensitive and confidential information" should be addressed by the club.
There have been plenty of times when "ITK" stuff has been written which has not been made public by the club -- so, by definition, is confidential.

It's about time the club either told ALL employess to observe confidentiality, or gave them carte blanche to be transparent with us. Personally I don't really care which way it goes, as long as it is the same rule for everyone.

[Olly]

sorry, i forgot the

[AndyB]

The "inconsistent" bit relates to the reasons given for dismissal as applied to ALL employees. i.e. NOT!

[Olly]

or normal, consistent and disrespectful

[AndyB]

Pete - missing the point (again). The fan base will be divided over PDS losing his job. Some wanted to give him a pre-season (me for one) others think he had enough time (you for example). Both, fair enough opinions.

What has peed everyone off is the way in which it has been done and the reasons given for it. Underhand, inconsistent and disrespectful.