Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: QPR's Loan System:

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Uxbridge
    Posts
    5
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default QPR's Loan System:

    QPR this season have loaned a total of 15 different players out. This is something which Les Ferdinand feels benefits the players and helps them grow as individuals, as he feels the under 23 league isn’t challenging enough. However rangers are trying to create a pathway from the academy into the first team and create local hero’s and do things the ‘right way’.
    Therefore I feel this loan system doesn’t really benefit the club or the players at all, if anything it delays the inevitable decision that most clubs will face is that the youth team players just aren’t good enough. We have seen it happen year after year that we keep loaning a academy player out in the hope he will return a superstar however knowing he isn’t quite good enough and eventually we make the decision that he simply isn’t going to make It and the famous phrase ‘we haven’t had a youth player since Richard Langley’ gets put on the broken record.
    The one shining light of what has been a pretty dull season for QPR has been the rise of Irish sensation Ryan Manning and this rise has seen him become a first team regular. However funnily enough Manning came straight from the academy into the first team without the need to be shipped out on loan. Now is this simply because rangers feel he is the next superstar or because we have already loaned out other midfielders Brandon Comley and Ben Gladwin.

    For example Michael Doughty is someone who has been at the club since 2007 and after making his first team appearance in 2011 has had 8 different loan moves. Now surely if rangers really think he is going to make the cut he would have made more than 10 appearances for the club in 6 years before being shipped out time and time again.
    Over the years ranges have had many academy players who have made loan moves to be told their not going to make it, for example: Michael Harriman eventually moved on to Wycombe after a series of loan spells away, a similar thing happened with players such as: Antonio German, Bruno Andrade and Frankie Sutherland. The only player who will hopefully buck the trend will be Darnell Furlong who has seen the loan move come and go and now sees himself in the first team picture.

    This just simply asks the question do the academy players need to make the dreaded loan move before they make their first team appearance or do the players which make the move simply not good enough and rangers deep down know they never will be.

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    5,832

    Default

    Definitely food for thought and hopefully something that will be addressed more carefully moving forward.
    Great first post btw. Welcome to the board.
    Minds Are Like Parachutes.
    Work Best When Open...
    @Nowt2SeeHere

  4. #4

    Default

    It's an interesting point of view but I have to disagree... Look at Furlong as an example of a successful loan setup. Look at Shodipo as someone who can come back better because of his loan out. Gladwin wasn't loaned out and look at his performances here? Loans are designed to give players opportunities to play, to learn, to make mistakes or gain confidence without being risked on the first team.

    Just going back to Furlong, without having been loaned out, he came into our first team 2 years ago and was destroyed by prem opposition. He needed to recover and the loan system worked perfectly for him, he came back and now is deservedly a regular in our setup.

    A loan move is beneficial to all parties... it gives players time to show off, it reduces the risk the club undertakes with them and gives other players at the club more game time.
    "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane


  5. #5

    Default

    I'm a fan of loaning players out to develop them more. A few years ago we were loaning out players to teams like boreham wood or even staines town! Now players are being loaned out to league 2 and even league 1 sides which is a massive positive imo, its the same as prem clubs loaning players to the championship etc.
    Comely for example has been one of grimsby's best players this season and when he returned in january a few league 1 clubs like peterbrough, swindon and mk dons were rumored to be interested in bringing him in on either a loan or a perm until grimsby got him back.

    It gives you a rough idea of whos good enough and whos not, i'd much rather (selfishly) see someone struggle in league 1/2 playing 10-20 than with us in the championship.

    The standard of our youth team has improved massively in the past few years with what imo is gunna be a golden generation of graduates, guys like lumley, furlong, manning, prohouly, petrasso, comely, eze and shodipo all have the potential to be first teamers for us and i'd be surprised if half of them don't.
    The thing most of them have in common is they've gone out on loan and impressed. Lumley is another one whos tearing it up at bristol with multiple motm awards and clean sheets too. He'd not have been given a chance here in a million years because of smithies but now we've got a good look at just how good he is and how much potential he has. The championship is a bit cut throat and unless you have something that impresses the manager immediatly you can't get much of a chance to get regular game time.

    Players like doughty though, you get the feeling hes not good enough (given the nature of our players to suddenly get good due to ollie it could easily change though lol) because of his time spent back with us. He developed at other clubs and did well there which is great for him and us, we could easily get 500k+ for him from a different club and at the same time he continues his career. It works out both ways, we either get a player back ready to play for us, or we sell them if they're not good enough

  6. Default

    Depends on how it's done. Look st Spurs loads of their players have been loaned out broken into the team or moved on to play very decent level

    Doughty not great example as he's not good enough never has been good enough and never will be good enough for us and I scratch my head when I read the number of fans bigging him up. Nice lad by all accounts but out of his depth at this club

    I think past problem is we had players on books who simply were not good enough and never should have been retained let alone sent out on loan as they had no future

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    The Ferry
    Posts
    2,344

    Default

    Originally Posted by corbray
    I'm a fan of loaning players out to develop them more. A few years ago we were loaning out players to teams like boreham wood or even staines town! Now players are being loaned out to league 2 and even league 1 sides which is a massive positive imo, its the same as prem clubs loaning players to the championship etc.
    Comely for example has been one of grimsby's best players this season and when he returned in january a few league 1 clubs like peterbrough, swindon and mk dons were rumored to be interested in bringing him in on either a loan or a perm until grimsby got him back.

    It gives you a rough idea of whos good enough and whos not, i'd much rather (selfishly) see someone struggle in league 1/2 playing 10-20 than with us in the championship.

    The standard of our youth team has improved massively in the past few years with what imo is gunna be a golden generation of graduates, guys like lumley, furlong, manning, prohouly, petrasso, comely, eze and shodipo all have the potential to be first teamers for us and i'd be surprised if half of them don't.
    The thing most of them have in common is they've gone out on loan and impressed. Lumley is another one whos tearing it up at bristol with multiple motm awards and clean sheets too. He'd not have been given a chance here in a million years because of smithies but now we've got a good look at just how good he is and how much potential he has. The championship is a bit cut throat and unless you have something that impresses the manager immediatly you can't get much of a chance to get regular game time.

    Players like doughty though, you get the feeling hes not good enough (given the nature of our players to suddenly get good due to ollie it could easily change though lol) because of his time spent back with us. He developed at other clubs and did well there which is great for him and us, we could easily get 500k+ for him from a different club and at the same time he continues his career. It works out both ways, we either get a player back ready to play for us, or we sell them if they're not good enough
    with bells on!

  8. Default

    Where in Cheshire are you Simon?

  9. Default

    Also over those poor years not having any decent youth coming through, but really how much is that down to the managers at the time, youll just never know how good they are unless given a chance, perfect example ryan manning! to think how hes took to it & yet jimmy i bet never even gave him a thought! so these players are maybe there but never been given a chance!

  10. #10

    Default

    Originally Posted by Pinkie
    Also over those poor years not having any decent youth coming through, but really how much is that down to the managers at the time, youll just never know how good they are unless given a chance, perfect example ryan manning! to think how hes took to it & yet jimmy i bet never even gave him a thought! so these players are maybe there but never been given a chance!
    I know you don't like Jimmy but he did give youth players opportunities, brought Shodipo in for example.
    "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane


  11. #11

    Default

    It makes sense. It must be better to get younger players out and playing in pretty good teams against other similar teams and with a proper atmosphere. If they take the opportunity it's a good career move for them whether with us or not. Only really outstandingly talented youngsters would make it directly to the first team in a club such as ours.

  12. Default

    It's also probably easier to move a player on after a loan spell, than if he was simply in the academy the whole time. So not only do we get to see if he'd work out for the 1st team, but other clubs can see if they'd want him for their squad.

  13. Default

    Originally Posted by nasser95
    It's an interesting point of view but I have to disagree... Look at Furlong as an example of a successful loan setup. Look at Shodipo as someone who can come back better because of his loan out. Gladwin wasn't loaned out and look at his performances here? Loans are designed to give players opportunities to play, to learn, to make mistakes or gain confidence without being risked on the first team.

    Just going back to Furlong, without having been loaned out, he came into our first team 2 years ago and was destroyed by prem opposition. He needed to recover and the loan system worked perfectly for him, he came back and now is deservedly a regular in our setup.

    A loan move is beneficial to all parties... it gives players time to show off, it reduces the risk the club undertakes with them and gives other players at the club more game time.
    I agree as I think loans in general are more beneficial to a player than staying at the club and never playing. Sometimes though there could be an argument for not going on loan as if Manning was on loan then quite possibly we would never have seen him play. Overall though I'm in favour.

    One minor thing though is Gladwin last season was on loan at Swindon and Bristol City and obviously now at Swindon again so he has been loaned out a few times now.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Luxemburg, Luxemburg
    Posts
    425

    Default

    Originally Posted by wortonranger
    It makes sense. It must be better to get younger players out and playing in pretty good teams against other similar teams and with a proper atmosphere. If they take the opportunity it's a good career move for them whether with us or not. Only really outstandingly talented youngsters would make it directly to the first team in a club such as ours.
    Exactly, it is attractive to youngsters if we can show them that if not at QPR they will have a good chance to create a career somewhere else.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    The Ferry
    Posts
    2,344

    Default

    Originally Posted by QPRHoop
    I agree as I think loans in general are more beneficial to a player than staying at the club and never playing. Sometimes though there could be an argument for not going on loan as if Manning was on loan then quite possibly we would never have seen him play. Overall though I'm in favour.

    One minor thing though is Gladwin last season was on loan at Swindon and Bristol City and obviously now at Swindon again so he has been loaned out a few times now.
    Gladwin was originally brought in to muddy the Luongo sell on fee. I suppose it was hoped that he might progress but wasn't our priority. He has done well on all his loan spells and will probably be sold on to a league 1 club for a small profit.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •