Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Our DOF gave Mr Ramsey a 3-year contract

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Our DOF gave Mr Ramsey a 3-year contract

    http://www.funeducation.com/News/IQ-...itive-problems

  • #2
    Another insightful thread. Thanks for posting
    You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

    Comment


    • #3
      Relevance of your link??
      Banning people is no longer my hobby,
      but take a look at my photo blog:

      http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/

      How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
      http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852

      Comment


      • #4
        I think we are all grown up enough to realise that a contract don't mean to much nowadays , bit of security .

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by winalotto View Post
          I think we are all grown up enough to realise that a contract don't mean to much nowadays , bit of security .
          A 3 years contract means a much larger payoff if he gets the sack within the first year.
          Banning people is no longer my hobby,
          but take a look at my photo blog:

          http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/

          How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
          http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Kirill View Post
            A 3 years contract means a much larger payoff if he gets the sack within the first year.
            There will likely be clauses in the contract that dictate pay offs & I very much doubt it's as simple as paying off his remaining wages in full.

            3 year deal is a sign of commitment IMO & tells me we are attempting to change our strategy & look more long term. I have to admit I would have preferred 2 years, but hey ho, not guna jump on TFs back when we know nothing about the contract particulars.
            You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

            Comment


            • #7
              We do not know what the contract says, perhaps there is a proviso about getting us up within a certain time.

              Comment


              • #8
                [QUOTE=Kirill;1418636]A 3 years contract means a much larger payoff if he gets the sack within the first year.[/QUOT

                No it doesn't , he could have signed a 10 year contract and still get the same pay off it goes wrong. Its a bit of security for the manager and the club saying you have time to rebuild ( that's a laugh isn't it) time in football.

                Comment


                • #9
                  So what you guys are basically saying the number of years spelled out in the contract means nothing if he gets an early sack? Just an empty number? So why not offer a 10-year contract then? Even more security
                  Banning people is no longer my hobby,
                  but take a look at my photo blog:

                  http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/

                  How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
                  http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Pay off's or the amount you get are specified in your contract when the contract is agreed , so it doesn't really matter what the length of the contract is , you sit down with the club and agree what that figure is, you would also get a loyalty figure and maybe even a percentage on fees you have made the club in transfers in and out, thats when time in a contract kicks in, you could be part of a really strong youth set up see a couple of players sold and be entitled to some of that money that the club make on those players. you can also contest an unfair dismissal , that can take time to sort out, was it Curbishley at west Ham that didn't except his pay off , took years but got the full amount paid up?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Kirill View Post
                      Relevance of your link??
                      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...g-ability.html

                      We need people in leading positions who can use their heads, not a bunch of former players who have used their heads too much (heading the ball too foten and prob not Mensa-material before that). Former players knows football from a players perspective, but often they don't have the abilities needed to make the best decisions for the club.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by MattyRangers View Post
                        Another insightful thread. Thanks for posting
                        Thank you.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X