Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mackie for Hangeland

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by qpr View Post
    No! Why the anti Mackie post. He gives his blood to QPR
    How is this an anti Mackie post? Not one negative comment or pop at him: simply a theoretical question from the OP.
    You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Ginger Ninja View Post
      No way. Hangeland wouldnt show half the passion mackie does.
      So what? Neither would Messi or Ronaldo but i am sure you would recognise that ability and importance to a team would come before how much passion someone shows?! Not saying Hangeland is in their class but he would be our best centre back by a mile and would start every game. We are crying out for a decent centre back.

      It is not all about passion and effort. Cisse does a third of Mackie's effort and passion. But if you had to pick one of them to put away chances you would play Cisse all day long.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Busheyboy View Post
        not sure this thread has a point
        how about swapping Boswinga, Bothroyd and Cisse for Messi and Pedro
        now that I'd fancy
        in fact I'd drive them over there
        The reason for the question is that there have been reports that Fulham were interested in Mackie and QPR interested in Hangeland. So I'm interested to see what other posters opinions on the swap scenario.

        There is no swipe at JM and no hidden agenda it's the question of the loss vs the gain

        Comment


        • #19
          like Harry says...if we had 11 Jamie Mackie's in our team we wouldnt be in this position.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by vblockranger View Post
            like Harry says...if we had 11 Jamie Mackie's in our team we wouldnt be in this position.
            He said the same about Nelsen and Hill but both are widely tipped to leave. They are good hard working players who has done well. If they go why not Mackie too?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by SammyKojoe View Post
              So what? Neither would Messi or Ronaldo but i am sure you would recognise that ability and importance to a team would come before how much passion someone shows?! Not saying Hangeland is in their class but he would be our best centre back by a mile and would start every game. We are crying out for a decent centre back.

              It is not all about passion and effort. Cisse does a third of Mackie's effort and passion. But if you had to pick one of them to put away chances you would play Cisse all day long.
              I take your point, but we needs forward players far more than centre backs imo.
              Top Scorers 2018/2019

              Nakhi Wells - 8
              Pawel Wszolek - 6
              Luke Freeman - 6
              Matt Smith - 6
              Ebere Eze - 4
              Joel Lynch - 3
              Tomer Hemed - 3
              Toni Leistner - 2
              Massimo Luongo- 2
              Angel Rangel - 2
              Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
              Geoff Cameron - 1
              Aramide Oteh - 1
              Jake Bidwell - 1
              Jordan Cousins - 1

              Summer Transfers 2019

              IN


              OUT

              Comment


              • #22
                Fulham is probably buying a new Norwegian defender Vegard Forren, I should believe this could mean that Hangeland is willing to listen to offers from other clubs?
                QPR
                Best team in the world
                Sort of

                Comment


                • #23
                  Yes without any hesitation.

                  No offence to Mackie, but QPR can use a number of other players in his position, i.e. Holiett, Park, SWP or change the formation around i.e. 3-5-2, 4-3-3, 4-4-1 etc depending on which players are signed or available.

                  Hangeland (or someone similar) is someone QPR actually need.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    But why should Hangeland want to go from stabilty to chaos. I don´t think he will even consider us.
                    QPR
                    Best team in the world
                    Sort of

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Shania View Post
                      But why should Hangeland want to go from stabilty to chaos. I don´t think he will even consider us.
                      Exactly. We are gonna proper struggle to attract anybody have respectable this window.
                      You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by stanistheman View Post
                        Yes without any hesitation.

                        No offence to Mackie, but QPR can use a number of other players in his position, i.e. Holiett, Park, SWP or change the formation around i.e. 3-5-2, 4-3-3, 4-4-1 etc depending on which players are signed or available.

                        Hangeland (or someone similar) is someone QPR actually need.
                        We have a winner

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Hope HR. will pull of a gem though, Matty.
                          QPR
                          Best team in the world
                          Sort of

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Shania View Post
                            Hope HR. will pull of a gem though, Matty.
                            Fingers crossed.
                            You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by stanistheman View Post
                              Yes without any hesitation.

                              No offence to Mackie, but QPR can use a number of other players in his position, i.e. Holiett, Park, SWP or change the formation around i.e. 3-5-2, 4-3-3, 4-4-1 etc depending on which players are signed or available.

                              Hangeland (or someone similar) is someone QPR actually need.
                              well if its all hypothetical then i would get rid of Hoilett,Park,Swp,Diakite and Mbia in midfield before i got rid of Jamie Mackie.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by vblockranger View Post
                                well if its all hypothetical then i would get rid of Hoilett,Park,Swp,Diakite and Mbia in midfield before i got rid of Jamie Mackie.
                                Hear hear.
                                Top Scorers 2018/2019

                                Nakhi Wells - 8
                                Pawel Wszolek - 6
                                Luke Freeman - 6
                                Matt Smith - 6
                                Ebere Eze - 4
                                Joel Lynch - 3
                                Tomer Hemed - 3
                                Toni Leistner - 2
                                Massimo Luongo- 2
                                Angel Rangel - 2
                                Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
                                Geoff Cameron - 1
                                Aramide Oteh - 1
                                Jake Bidwell - 1
                                Jordan Cousins - 1

                                Summer Transfers 2019

                                IN


                                OUT

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X