Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mackie for Hangeland

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Mackie can't play for 'Angeland, he's already been capped :pleasantsuprise:

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by 12321 View Post
      Mackie can't play for 'Angeland, he's already been capped :pleasantsuprise:
      tumbleweed1.jpg

      You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by vblockranger View Post
        like Harry says...if we had 11 Jamie Mackie's in our team we wouldnt be in this position.
        He's correct we would be in league 1? because we would have very little ability in the team and just runner which gets you nowhere.

        Comment


        • #34
          Why not keep Mackie and buy Vegard Forren....

          Comment


          • #35
            Forren is Fulham or Everton bound they say.
            QPR
            Best team in the world
            Sort of

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Shania View Post
              Forren is Fulham or Everton bound they say.
              Not over til the fat one sings.

              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeldwfOwuL8

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by swede View Post
                Not over til the fat one sings.

                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeldwfOwuL8
                That looked more the Briatore style really!:pleasantsuprise:
                QPR
                Best team in the world
                Sort of

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Shania View Post
                  That looked more the Briatore style really!:pleasantsuprise:
                  Maybe we need him negotiating in this transfer window.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by swede View Post
                    Maybe we need him negotiating in this transfer window.
                    Not sure really. To be frankly, I think Harry is the better option.:=):
                    QPR
                    Best team in the world
                    Sort of

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Shania View Post
                      Not sure really. To be frankly, I think Harry is the better option.:=):
                      If we still had Flavio here he could`ve had Naomi or Heidi as co-negotiaters. Then we would`ve had a couple of signings by now.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by swede View Post
                        If we still had Flavio here he could`ve had Naomi or Heidi as co-negotiaters. Then we would`ve had a couple of signings by now.
                        That could be. But again, the players would have signed for the wrong reasons. On the other hand, we are getting used to that now..
                        QPR
                        Best team in the world
                        Sort of

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by vblockranger View Post
                          like Harry says...if we had 11 Jamie Mackie's in our team we wouldnt be in this position.
                          More a dig at others not pulling their weight than Mackie being our saviour.

                          Swap? All day long.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            What about swapping Bosingwa or Park for Hangeland ?

                            Two highly paid underperformers not even starting games.

                            Would make more sense from a football perspective than swapping Mackie who actually plays and contributes to the team.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by zeberdee View Post
                              What about swapping Bosingwa or Park for Hangeland ?

                              Two highly paid underperformers not even starting games.

                              Would make more sense from a football perspective than swapping Mackie who actually plays and contributes to the team.
                              Not to Fulham it wouldn't.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I hear people at the ground come up with similar quotes. One the other week even said, and I quote, "if we had 11 Jamie Mackies we would be top of the league." What they actually mean by that is if we had 11 players of Adel's ability and Mackie's puff we wd be top of the league. Which might be true. 11 actual Jamie Mackies and we wd struggle in the Championship. Because so many of our players are so lazy, some of our fans have exaggerated the qualities of Mackie because he is a trier and a decent bloke.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X