Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 80

Thread: Stadium - itk told me unigate 100%

  1. Default

    If we move to the Unigate site we may have to change our name the 'Milkmen'. TF will become known as 'Ernie' but who will be Two Ton Ted from Teddington?
    These ads are only displayed to guests. Please login to remove them.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Staines
    Posts
    15,057

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QPR Richard View Post
    Any builders or clever bods know if a 45k stadium will fit on that site?
    Dont know the size of the site tbh, but you would be very suprised how much you can fit on a relatively small building foot print.

    IF this is the site in question, then this would already have been discussed at the design feasability stage as we are at a more advanced stage I believe, with TF having mentioned designs already (or am I making this bit up?!).
    Whoever invented the word 'Hot Surface' in Braille was an evil genius.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by essex View Post
    http://www.whitecityw12.co.uk/

    Final designs available on 18th july apparently, may go along
    gulp,...now im doubting

  4. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Park Street Ranger View Post
    If we move to the Unigate site we may have to change our name the 'Milkmen'. TF will become known as 'Ernie' but who will be Two Ton Ted from Teddington?
    you're milking this one now......

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattyRangers View Post
    Dont know the size of the site tbh, but you would be very suprised how much you can fit on a relatively small building foot print.

    IF this is the site in question, then this would already have been discussed at the design feasability stage as we are at a more advanced stage I believe, with TF having mentioned designs already (or am I making this bit up?!).
    It's 10.3 acres.

  6. #36

    Default

    I think this is unlikely July 18, you can see the plans. Then there a numerous consulations and they are not thinking of coming to a decision until next year. I don't think Tony wants to wait that long as he seems anxious to get started. Though having said that if he comes to an agreement that we have the stadium and the council (or whoever) gets there "affordable" housing then it might work. Berkeley Homes built the apartments where we live and they go building permission on the understanding that they also provided "affordable" housing. Not sure there is a problem with having a stadium in a residential area. Wimbledon is in a residential area, which is why there was all the fuss about them finishing at 11 pm.

  7. Default

    i imagine you need at least 6 acres for stadium footprint alone

  8. #38

    Default

    Sorry for the errors. Not able to edit the post.

  9. Default

    so is LR residential

  10. Default

    cant imagine that site being residential anyway. i wouldnt want to live there

  11. Default

    as for mayors urban regeneration. isnt building a stadium on derelict land regeneration

  12. #42

    Default

    Yes, but in 1904 when it was built, I don't think people bothered about that sort of thing.


  13. Default

    udderly ridiculous.
    twitter @silvercue

  14. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Twickenham
    Posts
    2,966

    Default

    I've located the ITK source

    Attached Images Attached Images

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •