Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 47

Thread: Traore and Taiwo futures in doubt as QPR line up move for Konschesky

  1. Default

    This can't be true
    These ads are only displayed to guests. Please login to remove them.

  2. #32

    Default

    awful player.
    Summer Transfers 2013:

    IN


    OUT
    Tal Ben Haim

    MY FIRST GAME

    Queens Park Rangers 4 (Holloway 52; Wilkins 59; Penrice 67, 79)
    Tottenham Hotspur 1 (Sheringham 28)

    Squad: J.Stejskal, D.Bardsley, C.Wilson, R.Wilkins, D.Peacock, A.McDonald, A.Impey, I.Holloway, D.Bailey, A.Sinton, G.Penrice.
    Bench: G.Thompson, D.Maddix, T.Roberts.

    Attendance: 19,845

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    resident of towie
    Posts
    25,125
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    so far ive backed sparkys decision making but this one would be debatable..........luke young is miles better imho!
    hello darkness my old friend...i come to talk to you again!

  4. #34

    Default

    I think Mark Hughes must be looking at back ups first b4 going for proper signings i for 1 is not fussed if koncesky comes in as cover for traore.
    TWITTER
    @alanfullerqpr

    FACEBOOK
    Alan Fuller


    QPR IS MY LIFE.

  5. #35

    Default

    He is ok or at least was, until he went to Liverpuke.

    He would not be replacing Traore, because I think, like many of us, Hughes rates him higher as a left sided midfielder/winger than a left back.

    My concern is at paying £1M for a 31 year old left back who is not anywhere near his peak.

    If Fabio is signing he will be 1st choice, and I don't see the point in buying Konchesky to provide cover, because Traore can provide do this, as can Hill or Young.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    5,458

    Default

    I will just have to trust Hughes' judgement on this one.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Irrelevant.
    Posts
    2,699

    Default

    The Joey Barton trend is gone, the paul konchesky trend is the new thing on here.

  8. #38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hal9thou View Post
    If this is true, than all the worries about an ageing, mediocre squad seem justified.

    Sam + West Ham = ex Bolton rest home
    Hughes + Rs = ex Fulham.
    its like a foolham take over from within............

  9. Default

    Would be surprised at this. IF & that's a big IF Hughes went for him I'd be hoping its as back up only & to bulk up the squad numbers & not as a replacement for either Traore or Taiwo as already mentioned he's pretty sh!t.

    Was alright 5 years ago.

  10. Default

    I can accept that Johnson and Nelson will be great squad players, but this one really is awful. I am hoping that some younger, better players are signed - as I wasnt expecting some of these names. Not saying we have to spend millions and millions, as we have a decent squad, but if we want to stand a real chance of progressing, we need to do better than players like Konchesky. I cant understand this one at all

  11. Default

    NO NO NO step in the wrong direction I pray this doesn't happen

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Andover via Marylebone
    Posts
    441

    Default

    Konchesky Please god no.

  13. #43

    Default

    Better than Traore defensively IMO
    aka qpr-buzsaky

    We signed the boy from white hart lane, Taarabt Taarabt
    He takes the p*ss again and again Taarabt, Taarabt
    He goes past one, he nutmegs 2
    He really is too good for you
    Adel Taarabt the genius of QPR


  14. #44

    Default

    Surely not? Traore and Hill are both better left backs. and if rumours of Fabio are true then surely this is ********?
    We're Queens Park Rangers and we always do things the hard way!
    "Rangers then, Rangers now, Rangers forever!"
    @Deadend_Friend

  15. #45

    Default

    The encouraging thing is that MH see's Traore as a left midfielder, which is great news.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •