Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Peter crouch

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jamesnutt
    started a topic Peter crouch

    Peter crouch

    Released by Burnley. JN

  • Shepherds Mush
    replied
    Ledge but can't see him giving up the podcasts and adverts to concentrate on playing....

    Leave a comment:


  • LoftusRoadLad
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesnutt View Post
    Released by Burnley. JN
    You mean retired by Burnley and given a gold watch

    Leave a comment:


  • Rebel R's
    replied
    Originally posted by Del View Post
    Blimey I've heard some crap over the years but all this no brainer talk about Crouch is just ridiculous. He's 38 FFS and hardly played for years because long past it. How exactly does that fit any sort of criteria for what we need to be a no brainer.
    Sensible post

    Leave a comment:


  • Del
    replied
    Blimey I've heard some crap over the years but all this no brainer talk about Crouch is just ridiculous. He's 38 FFS and hardly played for years because long past it. How exactly does that fit any sort of criteria for what we need to be a no brainer.

    Leave a comment:


  • northampton rs
    replied
    Surely he would play for us for free, old times sake and all that.
    What with that new advert he is doing, he donít need paying.

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRDave
    replied
    Originally posted by Stainrod View Post

    Thatís what I mean , why replace a striker that canít run with an even older one that canít run.
    Yeah with you on your point Stainrod

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRDave
    replied
    Originally posted by stanistheman View Post



    I understand your point, but QPR received a fee for Smith and Crouch would be free and the latter imo is better at holding the ball up and laying it off for teammates.

    Having said that, I don't think Crouch will be joining QPR unless he is happy to accept a weekly salary of £10k or less.
    Completely agree every word. My only concern though is Crouchy could make us
    a route 1 team.

    Leave a comment:


  • stanistheman
    replied
    Originally posted by Stainrod View Post
    Donít see the point of selling Matt Smith to replace him with an ancient crouch .


    I understand your point, but QPR received a fee for Smith and Crouch would be free and the latter imo is better at holding the ball up and laying it off for teammates.

    Having said that, I don't think Crouch will be joining QPR unless he is happy to accept a weekly salary of £10k or less.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stainrod
    replied
    Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
    Don't see the point of selling Big Matt.
    I thought Warbs was wanting mobile strikers?
    Thatís what I mean , why replace a striker that canít run with an even older one that canít run.

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRDave
    replied
    Don't see the point of selling Big Matt.
    I thought Warbs was wanting mobile strikers?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gtleighsr3
    replied
    They have measured him up and it a no goer,wages not a problem but the cost of changing door frames etc was too much

    Leave a comment:


  • knocker
    replied
    No brainer if he's cheap.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rebel R's
    replied
    As a last resort perhaps

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRFCJIM
    replied
    Oh, I appear to have duplicated this post. My deepest apologies to all.

    Released by Burnley - can't be that expensive. Check.
    He personally doesn't need the money. Check .
    He's a Ranger. Check.
    He's a top bloke and has a heart. Check.

    Welcome home Crouchy.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X