Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brighton's Italian rumour

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dogsrrs
    started a topic Brighton's Italian rumour

    Brighton's Italian rumour

    R/ b schilloto rumoured t as possible signing after losing his place

  • Tarbie
    replied
    Originally posted by Leweshoop View Post
    Hes more of a winger but hes bloody fast my Brighton mates nicknamed him the greyhound last season
    Again, do we need that? Got loads of wingers haven't we?

    Leave a comment:


  • Leweshoop
    replied
    Hes more of a winger but hes bloody fast my Brighton mates nicknamed him the greyhound last season

    Leave a comment:


  • QPRDave
    replied
    Didn't know Brighton was ITK

    Do we need a stilleto at the back ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gtleighsr3
    replied
    being Italian,should be mustard at back tracking

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Ninja
    replied
    Did they say this month? Or could we be looking at targets for the summer?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sleeping Giants
    replied
    Originally posted by Shepherds Mush View Post
    With the constraints we've got on transfers I'd hardly think we'd be looking at getting a player in for a position we already have cover for.

    Utter nonsense article.
    I read somewhere that can play further up the pitch also so versatile and perhaps cover for defensive midfield?...but agree probably just rubbish journo rumour.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarbie
    replied
    Originally posted by Shepherds Mush View Post
    With the constraints we've got on transfers I'd hardly think we'd be looking at getting a player in for a position we already have cover for.

    Utter nonsense article.
    My thoughts too mate. Seems the rumour was started by HITC anyway, which is normally a good indication that it's BS.

    Leave a comment:


  • qpr4life
    replied
    Originally posted by Shepherds Mush View Post
    With the constraints we've got on transfers I'd hardly think we'd be looking at getting a player in for a position we already have cover for.

    Utter nonsense article.
    What I thought as well, couldnt quite get it around my head.

    I don't think we're lacking in any department, just injuries have hit us and players have stepped up for me. Unless a player of real quality comes up I doubt the club will make a move given circumstances.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shepherds Mush
    replied
    With the constraints we've got on transfers I'd hardly think we'd be looking at getting a player in for a position we already have cover for.

    Utter nonsense article.

    Leave a comment:


  • qpr4life
    replied
    Can we even sign him?

    Leave a comment:


  • dogsrrs
    replied
    Originally posted by corbray View Post

    i'm assuming that the club sees furlong's long term future as a cb which i agree with, he looks very assured at cb! in which case this kind of signing makes sense, rangel is 36 and the jury is still out on kakay
    It might be journo b/s corbs tho your comments make it seem as though it's got legs

    Leave a comment:


  • davieqpr
    replied
    Schelotto

    Leave a comment:


  • corbray
    replied
    Originally posted by Tarbie View Post
    Do we need him? I thought Rangel was extending to the end of the season. Then we have Furlong and Kaykay who can play there.

    Left back is where we need cover surely?
    i'm assuming that the club sees furlong's long term future as a cb which i agree with, he looks very assured at cb! in which case this kind of signing makes sense, rangel is 36 and the jury is still out on kakay

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarbie
    replied
    Do we need him? I thought Rangel was extending to the end of the season. Then we have Furlong and Kaykay who can play there.

    Left back is where we need cover surely?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X