Qpr fan arrested.

[scaz_QPR]

QPR Statement:

https://www.qpr.co.uk/news/club-news...-tower-effigy/

[OldR]

Just as sceptical after watching this?

Am I sceptical after knowing that he fleeced £100K for a TV studio that was never built? Yes.

Am I sceptical after knowing that he fleeced 'thousands' of donations pretending he was going to sue the Metropolitan Police, CPS, The Independent and Lizzie Dearen? Yes

Am I sceptical after knowing that he fleeced thousands of pounds pretending that he was going to sue the Cambridgeshire Police force? Yes.

Am I sceptical after knowing that he is a convicted fraudster? Yes

Am I sceptical after knowing that he has a conviction for pretending to be someone he wasn't to gain entry to The United States of America? Yes.

Do you see the developing trend here? He's a consistent liar.

The way the case was rushed through was a disgrace and, as I said, if he had been called Ngdongo Maushe and lived in Zimbabwe Amnesty International would be all over it. However, he wasn't 'literally tortured', as claimed above, and if his treatment in prison was at odds with existing laws/regulations this money obsessed fraudster WOULD have finally sued...

[Stanley]

I see no hard evidence of literal torture. I do see a shrewd operator at work. Fair play: everyone has to make a living.

Just as sceptical after watching this?

[lymehoop]

can someone explain to me why the need for the football team he supports was mentioned and for what purpose?

[QPRDave]

Who knows mate ? Got to be stitch up really ,because ,as you say ,you must know ,your going to be vilified for doing something sick like this ,if it goes public .

Exactly

[QPRDave]

They were saying on one of the news broadcasts last night that's the only possible charge and even then it may prove incredibly difficult to reach a successful prosecution as, it seems, none of them put the footage on social media. The person who did originally put it on Twitter could be found guilty but surely to pursue that matter would be an unjustifiable waste of Police resources?

And did that person put it up to stitch them up and expose them?
That was what i was asking vesps.
Other wise it's a bit thick, showing yourself doing something really stupid, even if not illegal

[hal9thou]

Literally tortured him. Watch it if you don't believe me and make your own mind up

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QoAxe0J3k3c

I see no hard evidence of literal torture. I do see a shrewd operator at work. Fair play: everyone has to make a living.

[OldR]

From what i can gather , and its only what i read ,its a Public Order offence , because it wasn`t kept as a private matter. I`m no expert though.

They were saying on one of the news broadcasts last night that's the only possible charge and even then it may prove incredibly difficult to reach a successful prosecution as, it seems, none of them put the footage on social media. The person who did originally put it on Twitter could be found guilty but surely to pursue that matter would be an unjustifiable waste of Police resources?

[vespa]

Horrible grotty area.

[vespa]

I'm wondering who it was that filmed it, and then decided to post it.
I mean you know or at least any sane person knows you will be vilified for it.
I'm wondering if there was someone there (the person filming) thought this not on.
Did he/she want to expose them? Are they still friends?

Who knows mate ? Got to be stitch up really ,because ,as you say ,you must know ,your going to be vilified for doing something sick like this ,if it goes public .

[vespa]

Which law exactly has been broken?

From what i can gather , and its only what i read ,its a Public Order offence , because it wasn`t kept as a private matter. I`m no expert though.

[Shepherds Mush]

Which law exactly has been broken?

Think once they put it on social media it became a public order offence didn't it ? Not sure TBH.

[OldR]

He sacked that legal team for trying to get him to accept the charge he was in contempt of court, his new legal team contested all charges.

But that's not what you said...

'That's not true, Tommy Robinson's legal team contested all charges', as you said, implies that at the original hearing(s) his team never acknowledged that he was in contempt of court... Regardless of his new legal team's stance, at one point, in the very recent past, those representing him accepted his guilt and were merely contesting the manner of his conviction and the severity of the custodial sentence.

[gaza09]

They contested only the manner of the conviction and suggested that he 'make a deal' with the CPS just last month.

'Robinson said: “I sacked my solicitors because they tried to broker a deal where I apologised and I admit guilt' (https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...-a3968546.html)

His defence is not about whether or not he was in contempt of court but that he didn't know he was.

He sacked that legal team for trying to get him to accept the charge he was in contempt of court, his new legal team contested all charges.

[OldR]

That's not true, Tommy Robinson's legal team contested all charges. The conviction was overturned so he is not guilty of any of the crimes you attribute to him.

They contested only the manner of the conviction and suggested that he 'make a deal' with the CPS just last month.

'Robinson said: “I sacked my solicitors because they tried to broker a deal where I apologised and I admit guilt' (https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...-a3968546.html)

His defence is not about whether or not he was in contempt of court but that he didn't know he was.