Every time I see this thread title it kicks this bloody song off in my head:
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
We don´t need a DOF
Collapse
X
-
Good points Dogs, DOF is not issue having competent one is
Les has learned on job and he’s ok now in my opinion
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Stanley View Post
Because the CEO has zero footballing experience, whereas the DOF does - therefore the two work together pooling their skill sets together. The CEO has business skills which the DOF does not.
Furthermore we've been down the road of having a CEO with no one of football experience to work alongside him and we all know that ended disastrously, so the DOF was appointed because the club learnt from that lesson.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by swede View PostWe have a CEO and the CEO should be the one pulling it together. The CEO is the leader of the club and responsible for a it´s overall operations and performance. Scouts reports-talk to the Manager and the Manager talks-reports to the CEO - why a DOF?
Furthermore we've been down the road of having a CEO with no one of football experience to work alongside him and we all know that ended disastrously, so the DOF was appointed because the club learnt from that lesson.
Leave a comment:
-
If two clubs are in for the same player and one offers 15% commission and the other club offers 22.5% who will look after? As a freelance his loyalty is to himself.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hitman34 View PostWhich means that clubs who pay him more commission will get first dibs. While we will be offered what ever our kidney beans pays for. Would much rather a scout who was full time employed by the club. Fair play to Penrice though, he must be on a nice little earner working for all those clubs.
How does it work if he works for say us and Brentford we’re both after a CB and same player identified fits both clubs criteria. Surely a conflict of interest
Leave a comment:
-
Which means that clubs who pay him more commission will get first dibs. While we will be offered what ever our kidney beans pays for. Would much rather a scout who was full time employed by the club. Fair play to Penrice though, he must be on a nice little earner working for all those clubs.
Leave a comment:
-
Probably right doggs. He probably does get a wage just not as much if solely employed by the club.
Leave a comment:
-
What's wrong with freelance means he's not on a weekly wage gets paid on results surely the clubs quids in rather having him on the books , am I right or wrong ?
who scouted the youngsters we signed this summer ?
Leave a comment:
-
So if he’s freelance how does he decide what players he pushes in or direction and what he pushes in other clubs. Don’t feel comfortable with this
Leave a comment:
-
So our chief scout is freelance and is not solely contracted to our club. What brains decided that, that was a good idea. Due to our poor financial situation, it is important to cut unnecessary expenditure. Think it's safe to say that the freelancer and his army of scouts who have manage 1 free transfer in two transfer windows is an unnecessary expense on the clubs finances. Then, we have dof grin, what purpose does this smiling joker serve. Gets the best part of a quarter of a million pounds per year to hire and fire his mates. Again another expense that this club does not need. Then we have Andy Sinton. A lovely fella but seriously, apart from shaking hands with the fans and posing for photos, is his wage warrented. Start cutting the off the pitch groupie gang before you start cutting the team and not replacing them.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: