Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

McLaren within 24hrs

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by James1979 View Post
    And itís also ranked in order of his win rate from top to bottom. So, thatís why your other statement does not make sense and of course his if ranked in order of win rate.....the next one down will be lower win rate %.
    So someone registers to defend ollie and ends up drowning him

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by RTID View Post
      Why don't we look at some facts to drive our opinions?

      http://www.managerstats.co.uk/managers/steve-mcclaren/

      Not pretty reading I'm afraid. Unless I am mistaken, the graph looks fairly depressing and poses the question as to why The Board would actually want to appoint a man with that record? With every successive managerial post, without exception, his win rate has got worse.

      Do you think we should print this off and post it snail mail to The Board as part of their 'due diligence'?

      We've seen this so many times with managers and players. Either they or The Board believe it will be better this time at QPR. In this instance, history suggests it will probably not be so.

      First post on here, btw, but posted plenty on Not606.
      And what did holloway's graph look like when we hired him?
      Or alternatively JFH's?.....
      How many times do we sign a player who on paper is Messi,...but turns into a mess with us, or we sign a player
      who nobody wants, (hill was a good eg) and he turned out to be a legend

      Comment


      • #33
        Why do I have a feeling the board are going to get this all wrong and whoever is appointed it will end in tears?
        @gatorTFC

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by gator View Post
          Why do I have a feeling the board are going to get this all wrong and whoever is appointed it will end in tears?
          Because you liked Ollie and wanted him to stay? Therefore youíre angry and disappointed so clouds your thinking?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by gator View Post
            Why do I have a feeling the board are going to get this all wrong and whoever is appointed it will end in tears?
            I don't think so. I think they are comfortable that SM will lift us from bottom half to top half, but still outside top 6. But he will be a better coach for our younger players, be stable within the team he picks and not play too many players out of position. SM was very appreciated by the club (players and board) under HR and they know what they get. His name rates is at least one notch higher than IH, ie more players interested in joining.
            I would not be surprised if SM signed a three year deal, or maybe even a four year deal.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by gator View Post
              Why do I have a feeling the board are going to get this all wrong and whoever is appointed it will end in tears?
              No guarantees in football. Clearly a decision to replace Ollie has been taken because he's done his job and the club is looking to push on and thinks we need more of a tactically astute coach. Could also indicate that FFP is being resolved soon and we end up in a stronger situation. Whatever the reasons, our squad should have performed consistently better this season.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by James1979 View Post

                Because you liked Ollie and wanted him to stay? Therefore youíre angry and disappointed so clouds your thinking?
                To be clear, I like the McClaren appointment if it happens, I thought Ollie did what he had to do with the clear out and restructuring, perhaps things will be different next season with a new manager! There has been no official appointment that I know of anyway and if we are under the same fiscal restraints and don't have a proper goal scorer or two I can't see a real huge improvement that's all!
                @gatorTFC

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by RTID View Post
                  Why don't we look at some facts to drive our opinions?
                  .
                  I'm afraid you're the one who needs to look at the facts. Firstly, you have misinterpreted the data. Secondly, the data is also out of date.

                  You need to apply some due diligence yourself.

                  It might also be worth reading the OP before launching in, as this thread was more about the consortium aspect of the SMac deal.
                  Last edited by hal9thou; 12-05-2018, 04:15 PM. Reason: still having browser issues....

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by hal9thou View Post

                    I'm afraid you're the one who needs to look at the facts. Fitsly, you have misinterpreted the data. Secondly, the data is also out of date.

                    You need to apply some due diligence yourself.

                    It might also be worth reading the OP before launching in, as this thread was more about the consortium aspect of the SMac deal.
                    It reminded me of this

                    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1BxFlmb6S6E

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by RTID View Post
                      Why don't we look at some facts to drive our opinions?

                      http://www.managerstats.co.uk/managers/steve-mcclaren/

                      Not pretty reading I'm afraid. Unless I am mistaken, the graph looks fairly depressing and poses the question as to why The Board would actually want to appoint a man with that record? With every successive managerial post, without exception, his win rate has got worse.

                      Do you think we should print this off and post it snail mail to The Board as part of their 'due diligence'?

                      We've seen this so many times with managers and players. Either they or The Board believe it will be better this time at QPR. In this instance, history suggests it will probably not be so.

                      First post on here, btw, but posted plenty on Not606.
                      Stick this in your pipe and smoke it........................................


                      QPR results when Steve McClaren was coaching with us in 2013.
                      Won 2-1 v Sheff Wed (H)
                      Drew 1-1 v Huddersfield (A)
                      Won 1-0 v Ipswich (H)
                      Won 1-0 v Bolton (A)
                      Won 1-0 v Leeds (A)
                      Won 1-0 v Birmingham (H)
                      Drew 0-0 v Brighton (H)
                      Won 1-0 v Yeovil Town (A)
                      Won 2-0 v Boro (H)#QPR
                      nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I'd take that all day long again

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Hitman34 View Post

                          Stick this in your pipe and smoke it........................................


                          QPR results when Steve McClaren was coaching with us in 2013.
                          Won 2-1 v Sheff Wed (H)
                          Drew 1-1 v Huddersfield (A)
                          Won 1-0 v Ipswich (H)
                          Won 1-0 v Bolton (A)
                          Won 1-0 v Leeds (A)
                          Won 1-0 v Birmingham (H)
                          Drew 0-0 v Brighton (H)
                          Won 1-0 v Yeovil Town (A)
                          Won 2-0 v Boro (H)#QPR
                          And not a hill of hell in sight

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            tenor.gif?itemid=9737909.gif

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Greg1882 View Post

                              Itís not in order you plum
                              Realised toio late. Apologies.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Greg1882 View Post

                                Itís not in order you plum
                                Just the right level of disdain!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X