Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hypothetically speaking.........

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by BigShark View Post
    To be fair he would probably play Buzsacky as a holding midfielder.

    Paulo Sousa has already played rowlands on the right, centre and left of midfield.

    Paulo Sousa has played Ageymang as a right winger?

    To early to say on Vine, but he came on Saturday and went


    right wing:grimace::grimace:

    You have no proof that he would play Buzsaky as a holding midfielder and maybe the reason why he has played players in other position is because he doesn't have a full fit squad.

    If Wolves lost Ebanks-Blake, Kightly, Jarvis and Iwelumo like we have lost Rowlands, Vine, Buzsaky and Agyemang are you saying that one Wolves would still be top and two that McCarthy would not need to experiment either.

    Any manager who doesn't have their four most influencial players available to them at the same time would struggle. Take just Torres and Gerrard out of Liverpool and they are a totally different team.

    Comment


    • #17
      He is NOT tactically inept-we have not looked like conceding.

      He has NO strikers.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by BigShark View Post
        Bennyboyr's

        What you know about football could be written on my thumb.

        All my history of supporting QPR, I've been entertained.

        I get more entertainment on Channel 4 Countdown to the way tactically Paulo Sousa's sets out his tactics
        You made yourself come accross really well there mate.

        Who are you again?
        You sound like another poster from this board...

        Rules being made to never insult, then being broken?
        Oh dear.
        Your mum would love me...

        Comment


        • #19
          no arguing with the Nodge.

          I guess Rowlandfs played right back because we did not have much alternatives or injury

          The reason our back 4 is so good is the tinkerman does not tinker with it too much.

          Middle 5 and front lone striker, he must decide by picking names out of a hat

          Comment


          • #20
            bennyboys I apologise.

            When was the last time you have a beer, enter the stadium and be pretty confident you would know the starting 11?

            Injuries is a lame excuse

            We beat Derby, Blackpool without Vine, Buzsacky, Ageymang and I must say pretty comfortably.

            When you don't have a strong squad, you don't keep rotating it.

            Charlton and Watford prime examples....WHY????????????

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by BigShark View Post
              bennyboys I apologise.

              When was the last time you have a beer, enter the stadium and be pretty confident you would know the starting 11?

              Injuries is a lame excuse

              We beat Derby, Blackpool without Vine, Buzsacky, Ageymang and I must say pretty comfortably.

              When you don't have a strong squad, you don't keep rotating it.

              Charlton and Watford prime examples....WHY????????????
              No offence taken.
              There are a few who resort to insults all the time and you were beginning to come accross that way, that's all

              Yes, you're right mate...But that's not always a bad thing.
              Let's be honest...Not all this can be blamed on the manager.
              I firmly believe he's told of a few players he HAS to play no matter what. This is not a good way to conduct business.

              Add to that the fact he has missed out on Buzz, Vine and Rowlands for pretty much his entire spell here, I think you'd have to agree we're being harsh on him?
              Your mum would love me...

              Comment

              Working...
              X