Nuff said; Crystal Palace next
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ramsey is not the answer discuss?
Collapse
X
-
He basically said that if the right decisions were made, then we would have won. It's pretty well known that this is true. I don't think there is a disaster Wests, I think it is a potential crisis of confidence brought about by the fact that things aren't going our way. I hope that we can calm the nerves at Palace because that would be a huge boost for the run in."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by nasser95 View PostHe basically said that if the right decisions were made, then we would have won. It's pretty well known that this is true. I don't think there is a disaster Wests, I think it is a potential crisis of confidence brought about by the fact that things aren't going our way. I hope that we can calm the nerves at Palace because that would be a huge boost for the run in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vblockranger View PostYep i have mate. So you dont think Caulker makes individual errors?"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostDon't think you can assume we would have won. Austin missed penalty first game it would have been nice to have had the decision given but come on you can't just say we would have won"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostYes agree but first goal was greens fault so by definition of what you just said green created part of the effect you speak off"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by nasser95 View PostRamsey is doing fine ffs. everyone is over reacting to a false result. what could he have done today? everyone played fine outside of the rio and none of them deserved to lose, especially like this.
One criticism I will make is that I think we set up too defensively at home. We need an attacking midfielder as a play maker to set up the strikers. And defensively we are a shambles but honestly, with the players we have, I don't know what can be done about it other than prayer.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nasser95 View Posthe wouldn't have been had the dive to win the free kick and resulting offside been called correctly.
The ref was dire but once decision is given although soft we defend the set piece, even if Kane was offside green should have smashed him making it irrelevant
Comment
-
Originally posted by dsqpr View PostI can see we are going to be in a minority here nasser but I agree with you. We are playing much better football under Ramsey. The squad at his disposal is not one of his own choosing and the matches he has had have all been difficult ones, not to mention that if it weren't for bad luck we'd have had none at all. If we stick to the task and keep playing well we have a shout of staying up, albeit a small one. I still like what I have seen under Ramsey. There is absolutely no point whatsoever in thinking about replacing him now. Nobody else is going to do any better with this squad. As for next season, well, let's see how this one finishes first.
One criticism I will make is that I think we set up too defensively at home. We need an attacking midfielder as a play maker to set up the strikers. And defensively we are a shambles but honestly, with the players we have, I don't know what can be done about it other than prayer.
Question not just for you but all. Yes the squad is poor hence the defence some are presenting for Ramsey but it's the same squad everyone has been saying would have stayed up had we got Pulis in so what's the difference??????
For record I like Ramsey I want him to do well he's been breath of fresh air don't mean he's above questioning
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nick View PostWhat if we scored those chances where the ball hit the wood work or scored the penalties that should've been rewarded??
Imho the plan is sort of working. I know that sounds focking stupid considering the 4 defeats but like mentioned before we do actually look more organised. And 'again' lost because of bad luck and bad refereeing...'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostRubbish your clutching at straws. We're there wrong decidions yes of course there were but that don't mean you turn off and can defend Greens applying effort. You got play the situation same as they say play to the whistle
The ref was dire but once decision is given although soft we defend the set piece, even if Kane was offside green should have smashed him making it irrelevant"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostI think we still have chance of staying up DS and I have seen improvements but until the prem start handing out points for good performances it's not a great deal of good to us
Question not just for you but all. Yes the squad is poor hence the defence some are presenting for Ramsey but it's the same squad everyone has been saying would have stayed up had we got Pulis in so what's the difference??????
For record I like Ramsey I want him to do well he's been breath of fresh air don't mean he's above questioning
It is possible that "everyone" was wrong about Pulis. It's very easy to SAY he would have kept us up but it doesn't mean much.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostI think we still have chance of staying up DS and I have seen improvements but until the prem start handing out points for good performances it's not a great deal of good to us
Question not just for you but all. Yes the squad is poor hence the defence some are presenting for Ramsey but it's the same squad everyone has been saying would have stayed up had we got Pulis in so what's the difference??????
For record I like Ramsey I want him to do well he's been breath of fresh air don't mean he's above questioning"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
Comment