qblockpete

Some secret!

Try reading the QPR Report Board Post - up for the past week:
http://qprreport.proboards.com/index...ay&thread=2804

As for the process: When WATRB moderator, Scott Jones initiated the idea of QPR Report attending and offered to attend on QPR Report's behalf
A couple posts later, WATRB Moderator Scott Jones said
"I think you may have to ask representation from Ali Russell."

But the whole thread is there. Some Secret. Some behind the back.

You have moderators on the ONEQPR team, did it not occure to you to ask them?

At a time of discouraging me, you were trying to worm your way in. Very sad state of affairs

Where is the
"You are actively ENCOURAGED to go over to the WATRB's web-site and bring me back any information"

thread on the 9th April.

You are actiing like man who has disciples !!

I think I detect some "projection" here on your behalf.

What's your problem? What's the trangression? Scott said I should go to Ali Russell, so I went to Ali Russell.
You think it's easier for me to get Russell than to contact my fellow moderators who are on the One QPR?
Now why did I ask people on my site to visit WATRB and let me know what was being said?
Because Pete, for the third time you had banned me from this site. You remember that ban, Pete. The one that your moderators lifted and apologized to me for you having imposed. You didn't actually mention it or respond to me.
Looking forward to you coming to post on my site. I promise not to ban you.

DFE is still banned by my moderators, so whats your point?

You encouraged supporters that in the light of recent events I should be removed from "OneQPR".

On what basis, would you recommend this? Because, I simply relied an opinion? o dear

Don't try and swing it, you are very proud man and keep telling us you have a number of moderators. More than one of these members are on the team of ONEQPR, why didn't you ask them?

Pete:

What has a ban on Dexter for England got to do with anything?

YOU banned ME. Until your Moderators lifted the ban
with this message
"On behalf of the WATRB team of administrators and moderators I would like to apologise for this ban that is now lifted. From what I have learned, it was caused by a misunderstanding and the decision was, unfortunately, rushed due to the posting frenzy we were having to deal with. We have a due process for banning and it was ignored. I and other hard-working members of the team will do our best to ensure this does not happen again. "

- As for what I said: For those who (unlike Pete) don't visit my messageboard, this is what I said:
-
The QPR Fan Groups Meet Club THIS Week
« Thread Started on Apr 9, 2009, 4:55pm »
________________________________________
Who should attend?
Personally I think given his conduct, and his close ties to certain club officials, fan groups should carefully consider the role of Pete in such a meeting - asuming they decide to go ahead and have the meeting. And you can argue it either way: Spite your face if you don't attend"

Nothing more. Nothing less. And it's self explanatory

Now I do have to repeat perhaps in single sylable words of the process I took. There's no there, there.

I contacted Russell, cos that's what I was told was the process I needed to take to apply for "inclusion."
No conspiracy, no end run. Nothing.




-

Take a look at you blog on here and please tell me its not personal towards me.

I'll give you 10 minutes to take a look at it again.

Maybe encourage others to look at it as well.

Who is not answering the questions now?

Why did you not go to one of your moderators and ask them. You have 4-5 on the ONEQPR TEAM?

Do you you think its right for a owner of a board to allow these kind of comments, on a web-site where all the team have invested time and money to make it a board worth visiting for all fans.

"First place in The Hall of Shame goes to QblockPete:"

not written by me of course, but your kind self.

I can go on

Pete:

You're not making sense. I've answered twice re OneQPR. Unlike with some people, when I give an answer, it doesn't keep changing.
I don't know whether it's based on your own experience, or your fantasies, or what, but while you may see deep conspiracies in the simplest act. Sometimes, as Freud was reported to have said, a cigar is just a cigar.

But I'm so happy to invite people to come at look at my site
- This is the QPR Report Messageboard
http://qprreport.proboards.com/index.cgi
This is the QPR Report Blog
http://www.qprreport.blogspot.com/

And as always, Pete, You're invited to post on my site, just as I post on yours.

This injured innocence is done well. But anything I've ever posted about you PALES in comparison to the various derogatory and derisory comments you've made to me.

Now I apologize that I didn't write to you personally and ask if it was ok about ONE QPR. I didn't realize it was your toy.

Re the "Hall of Shame" you refer. Well I'm glad that at least someone is reading my blog posts! Since you give people blogs to write on, not sure why you're objecting if I use the blog.
But since you mention it: This is my completed blog post to which you're referring (and which you could of course have responded to at any time). Now what parts of it do you wish to comment on?

1 in The The Hall of Shame
Posted 05-04-2009 at 08:51 AM by QPR Report

---------------------------------------------------------------
First place in The Hall of Shame goes to QblockPete:

For an incessant campaign against Sousa; for his seeming willingness to promote the views and agenda of individuals within the club; and for his unyielding and unthinking defense of Paladini; and for his character assassinations of those who hold different views.

Pete's "De Canio is prepared to come back" post was revealing.

And Pete's attack on Sousa for lying by citing what Blackstock's agent said. When in fact what the very quote from the agent cited by Pete, in no way proved that Sousa was lying.
http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/f...ead.php?t=5524

A man who talks about people disagreeing with him having agendas continues to appear to be serving as a "Stalking Horse" for others.

Sooner or later, the "chickens will come home to roost."

http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=127

Why did you not go to one of your moderators and ask them. You have 4-5 on the ONEQPR TEAM?

Pete:

OK I WILL MAKE IT SIMPLE FOR YOU

THIS IS QPR REPORT
SEE QPR REPORT POST
POST QPR REPORT POST

HOW SHOULD I GET SEE ABOUT ONE QPR?
CONTACT ALI RUSSELL
SO QPR REPORT CONTACTS ALI RUSSELL

IF I HAD THOUGHT THE PROCESS WAS NOT TO GO THROUGH ALI RUSSELL, I WOULD NOT HAVE GONE THROUGH ALI RUSSELL. I WOULD HAVE CONTACTED ONE OF THE QPR "REPS"

SEE PETE ASK.
LOOK AT PETE ASK
SEE PETE SEE
AN ANSWER

oh dear your getting angry:grimace::grimace:

What about the campaign to oust me from ONEQPR?

and I ask again, why not ask a member of ONEQPR?

I'm not suggesting you ask me ( I would have helped), but asking a member who is a moderator on your site may in hindisght have been better?

Pete:

It's gets frustrating responding to someone who gets a response to a question. Asks that same question. Gets another response. And so on. Pete: It's very simple: Read this thread. I told you what, why, where, who, when.

Now if your question is: Should I have taken as gospel the declaration of WATRB's In the Know Moderator Scott Jones that Ali Russell was the correct person to contact about ONE QPR?

Well obviously if I had known that Ali Russell was not the correct person to contact, then I would have contacted one of the several people who are also moderators of my very humble messageboard.

But the good news is that Ali Russell arranged for it to be sent to the correct person, so all's well that end's well.

But your concern that I save myself time and effort is of course greatly appreciated.

Now since I've made so many posts on WATRB, greatly looking forward to your trailblazing post on QPR Report's messageboard.

I will not post, but good luck.

25% threads are from this site or what I have said, so no real need to post.

Well that's about the same accuracy ration of your posts, so I won't take offense.

Strange how you always come up with different reasons why not to post on my humble site! Don't worry about it. When you change your mind, the option will always be available to you.

Don't need to, but many thanks for the offer.

Anything worth posting from me on here, you post on your messageboard

if you get my drift.

So it would seem. After all where else would I be able to learn that our League Cup Final success was actually in 1968.

thats my point

no-one in your world, can make a simple mistake.. I write too quick half the time.

Anyway, thats the year i was born and we all know you was 50 at the time;D

I wish you were young sexy mud-wrestling women
instead of middle-aged ugly mud-slinging blokes